Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified Sith trooper (catacombs)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Unidentified Sith trooper (catacombs)
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Toprawa
        • 1.1.2.2 Ecks Dee
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Unidentified Sith trooper (catacombs)

  • Nominated by: Menkooroo 04:30, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A recently approved Comprehensive Article, now just over 350 words with an intro and a p&t section. More at home here on the GAN page.

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:53, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Grunny (talk) 09:19, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
  3. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:14, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Kilson 03:01, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:25, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
  6. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 14:18, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • I'm kind of confused on why the article references the TBP publication for the character's death info. Can this not be sourced to a specific issue? Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:17, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
    • It's a little weird --- Issues 47 - 50 of Legacy gave a date of 137 ABY in the front of each issue, but that date was changed to 138 ABY in the trade. I thought it would be kind of misleading to source 138 ABY to the individual issue, and the date given in the trade seems to be the new, canonical date according to Lucasfilm Limited. I guess I could source the entire article to the trade, but I still like to source to specific issues whenever possible. Do you think it's OK? Menkooroo 23:58, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
      • Yeah, I think what you have is fine. I definitely also think sourcing by individual issue where possible is best. Would you be able to add a little note to that reference briefly explaining what you just explained for me here? Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:02, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
        • Done! Check it out. Thanks for the tip. Menkooroo 02:34, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • You know, this may sound nitpicky, but I feel it should be made clearer in the intro that he committed suicide. Something like "…and the trooper ignited a lightsaber, impaling themselves beneath the chin." 1358 (Talk) 21:25, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
    • Changed it to read more like the wording in the body. You're right; it was definitely weird before. I was trying to avoid using "they" or "his/her." Better now? Menkooroo 11:18, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:18, March 23, 2011 (UTC)


  • Here's the GAnom edit. Sorry for forgetting to annotate it. Menkooroo 04:30, March 14, 2011 (UTC)