Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified Mon Calamari Star Cruiser

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified Mon Calamari Star Cruiser

• Nominated by: --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 01:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I've found all the information I could regarding this starship. It remains one of the most under appreciated ships in Star Wars. Even though it's the most numerous and prominent Mon Cala cruiser in Return of the Jedi, it's the one least used in all subsequent media.
• Date Archived: 01:22, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
• Final word count: 849 words (176 introduction, 480 body, 193 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional):

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 05:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
2. —spookywilloww^talk 21:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
3. Lewisr (talk) 00:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
4. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:21, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Object

Lew

• Context for Endor, in the intro and body. Context for the Liberty, Nautilian, Millennium Falcon in the body
  • Added --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 16:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
• The intro could use a date
  • Added --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 16:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
• BTS doesn't need to note the director of the film Lewisr (talk) 22:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Removed --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 16:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
• For both the intro and body, 'Once it was revealed to be a trap' when what was revealed to be a trap?
  • Elaborated --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 15:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
    • This was also in the 2nd paragraph of history, if you wouldn't mind please Lewisr (talk) 15:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
• The intro could use a bit of a restructuring I think. It appears it would be better to move the info after 'With the exception of the port and starboard wings' to the first paragraph and then move the info after 'Shortly prior to the Battle of Endor' to the second paragraph Lewisr (talk) 23:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Reworded intro --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 15:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Anil

• The CineFex reference should use {{BookCite}}. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:47, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Added --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 16:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Macaroni

• You have the exact same sentence about the Liberty resemblance in the intro/body, can you reword one of them?
  • Done --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 14:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
• This is a little confusing - it reads like they added wings to this model, but then you say that the winged version became the Liberty-type. "The starship's model was created by Industrial Light & Magic for the film, and wings were added to create more variation in the rebel fleet. The winged model became the MC80 Liberty Type Heavy Star Cruiser." JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 04:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Reworded --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 14:54, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Fred strikes back

• Starships of the Empire and the Rebellion seems to indicate that the MC80A is actually different from the Home One and further muddies the waters, it seems. Have you checked this source? Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 22:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
  • I reviewed the information in Starships of the Empire and the Rebellion and I don't see where there's ambiguity. Can you be more specific? Thanks! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 03:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
    • Actually, I looked it over again, and it was me who got the MC80A and MC80 mixed up. This article seems to be consistent with that book, too. Gah, it's all so confusing. XD Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 05:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
      • Definitely! No worries. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 00:17, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 01:21, 21 October 2023 (UTC)