Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified Imperial deck officer

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Unidentified Imperial deck officer (Imperial-class Star Destroyer)
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 spookly
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Unidentified Imperial deck officer (Imperial-class Star Destroyer)

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 17:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 06:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 481 words (66 introduction, 296 body, 119 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 481 words (66 introduction, 296 body, 119 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMBITION, WP:FFGAMES, WP:VG

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Hey, that Rank insignia plaque is BLUE Fan26 (Talk) 01:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 16:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 21:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 06:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Object

spookly
  • "At one point, they blocked access"—the singular usage of they confuses me here a bit. In the Biography at least, 'they' predominately refers to the smuggler and then the officer is 'officer' or 'he'. Was this perhaps meant to be "he blocked access" or was there an unrelated reason for the singular they here for the officer?—spookywillowwtalk 01:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Yeah, just an oversight. Imperators II(Talk) 06:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 06:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)