Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tide of Progress XII (second nomination)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Tide of Progress XII

• Nominated by: Lewisr (talk) 02:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• Date Archived: 06:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
• Final word count: 685 words (84 introduction, 483 body, 118 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:CIS WP:FFGAMES

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Fan26 (Talk) 01:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
2. —spookywilloww^talk 01:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
3. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
4. OOM 224 (he/him) 10:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
5. Nice job. UberSoldat93 (talk) 06:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Object

Anil

• Per precedents like Dreadnought-class heavy cruiser and Onager-class Star Destroyer, the article should treat that FFG announcement as a source and note it in BTS. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 19:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Updated Lewisr (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
    • Looks good! Though, I don't think the bit about the first depiction is accurate since you can see an image of that card when you click on "Tide of Progress XII" in the FFG article. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
      • Myb, how's that now? Lewisr (talk) 21:45, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
        • Great! Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Uber

• I'm curious as to why our notability policy regarding canon subjects doesn't apply here. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Updated Lewisr (talk) 20:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
• "The ship was operated by a crew of 200, with up to 150,000 battle droids." A little unsure what the battle droids are doing aboard the ship. Did you mean it could hold droids up to that number?
  • Cleared up Lewisr (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
• If I'm not mistaken, that cross-section is reused from the ROTS book, so that should be mentioned.
  • Mentioned Lewisr (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
• A Mediacat is in order. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:53, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Created and added Lewisr (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments

• For the record, I have re-reviewed the article after the update and objections have been handled via Discord. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 06:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)