Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Team Millennium Holos

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Team Millennium Holos
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Jujiggum
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Team Millennium Holos

  • Nominated by: NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 22:50, December 4, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The Return of the Teams.

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ~SavageBOB sig 18:51, December 16, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Good work. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 21:27, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:17, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 20:40, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Menkooroo 06:18, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
  6. --Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 22:19, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Jujiggum
  • First sentences of the intro and bio are practically identical.
    • Fixed. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 21:08, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
  • Why no mention in the history section of the in-universe coverage of their success?
    • If I recall correctly, we decided not to include that in the history unless the subject interacted with the paper, such as on Wuuden Malnic, Jipoly Numifolis or Lomina Argo. Or maybe that's just how it's been practiced, rather than a decision. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 21:08, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
      • I still think it would be a good idea; is it not notable that it got a story on the HoloNet? Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 19:57, December 16, 2011 (UTC)
        • The way I see it, not really. It's a galactic sports event, so naturally it would get some coverage. One would think most galactic events make the news (the wars, political upheavels, major deaths, Luke's every breath), but if the paper says nothing controversial no-one mentions it. I suppose you could phrase that as "it's not notable in-universe" if you'd like. The HoloNet article just stated the fact of the event, as we do, but the paper did not actually play a part in it. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 21:06, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
          • Makes sense; that's fine then. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 21:27, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
  • Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 00:58, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • My apologies for the late reply. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 19:57, December 16, 2011 (UTC)
      • No problem. Busy time of year. :) NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 21:06, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:57, December 27, 2011 (UTC)


  • Not an objection, but please note that proper formatting—per WP:S—requires that there be a space between the parentheses (") and the slash (/) of the refs. I took care of them this time, but please watch this in the future.--Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 01:59, December 5, 2011 (UTC)