Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tauber

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Tauber
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 AV
        • 1.1.2.2 Anil
        • 1.1.2.3 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Tauber

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 16:58, October 14, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: IT'S A MEDICAL WORLD, GET IT

(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 12:26, October 18, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Fan26 (Talk) 22:30, October 20, 2019 (UTC)
  3. AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:15, October 21, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 22:09, December 6, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:52, December 16, 2019 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:11, December 17, 2019 (UTC)

Object

AV
  • Per the Fact File entry for EV-A4-D, "the droid was speedily removed from its post as supervisor to the medical droid pool of a major hospital on the Inner Rim world of Tauber", so the article should be updated to specific that it was a major hospital. Also, is world more precise terminology than astronomical object? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:57, October 14, 2019 (UTC)
    • Thanks, both bits added. Imperators II(Talk) 07:48, October 15, 2019 (UTC)
Anil
  • Isn't it fair to assume that Tauber was a terrestrial world? TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 12:02, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
    • Based on what? Imperators II(Talk) 19:03, October 16, 2019 (UTC)
      • As Neuro-Saav labs and a hospital resided "on" Tauber, per the source wording. Even if it's a waterworld, I believe that still counts as a terrestrial planet. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 03:41, October 17, 2019 (UTC)
        • Apologies for interrupting here, but I thought I'd bring this up. While the source may or may not have intended "on" to mean it was a terrestrial world, could it not also be used to describe something built on a structure in the atmosphere of a gas giant, such as Bespin? Zed42 (talk) 03:47, October 17, 2019 (UTC)
          • I don't think it would, or should, use the term "on" for that. For example, the Databank entry for Lando Calrissian uses the term "on" for Vandor, Kessel, Numidian Prime, and Tatooine, but avoids using it particularly for Bespin. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 04:22, October 17, 2019 (UTC)
            • Until I encounter Legends examples of the preposition "on" used to describe gas giants, I'll acquiesce to your objection. Imperators II(Talk) 10:02, October 18, 2019 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • I have a minor issue with the date reference, which isn't your fault since you didn't create the template. The template states that Guardians of the Chiss Key "takes place sometime after 'The Gungan General,'" but what is that based on? I don't see how that would be self-referencing, meaning that that claim needs some kind of attribution. Like "...takes place sometime after 'The Gungan General,' based on [something]." The entire reference kind of hinges on this point. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:46, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
    • Thanks. Template expanded. Imperators II(Talk) 09:43, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
      • Good. I concise-d it up a little bit. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 10:21, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
      • Thanks! Imperators II(Talk) 10:35, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
  • Jaso sector is currently exclusive to the infobox. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 10:28, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
    • Oh, dear. Added to body. Imperators II(Talk) 10:35, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
  • Apologies for holding this nomination up even longer, but regarding the Jaso sector, I see AIR denotes it as "one of the most important medical areas in the galaxy." I would like to see this detailed in the Description section. It's important to Tauber because it means that Tauber is part of a larger medical community with respect to its sector neighbors. Otherwise this information is not being represented in the article. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:48, December 17, 2019 (UTC)
    • Please take a look. Imperators II(Talk) 10:39, December 17, 2019 (UTC)
      • Nice. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:11, December 17, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:11, December 17, 2019 (UTC)


  • Regarding Anil's objection, I noticed some character from TOR uses "on" when referring to starships that are likely orbiting Bespin. I don't know if something from TOR that's probably just bad writing works, but thought I'd bring it up just in case it's what's being looked for. Fan26 (Talk) 13:32, October 18, 2019 (UTC)