- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Tan
- Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 15:48, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Another old, classic oddity retconned by Abel Peña
(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
Support
- Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 15:07, August 16, 2013 (UTC) - 501st dogma(talk) 15:20, August 20, 2013 (UTC)
IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 02:07, August 21, 2013 (UTC)- CC7567 (talk) 20:03, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
- GAN Tanbris next. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:03, September 13, 2013 (UTC)
Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 19:12, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
Object
Exiled Jedi
Right now the infobox picture does not make a lot of sense. Could you add a caption to the picture to say why the picture is relevant? If you have not done this before, here is an example.- Done. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:04, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
Unless it is stated in a source, I am not sure if you should mention that the title was seldom-used or only known to be given to two recipients.- I tried to reword the problematic bits. See if you think it's better that way. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:04, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
- I always enjoy reading articles like this one.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 14:52, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
- So do I, and that why I also enjoy writing them. ;-) --LelalMekha (talk) 15:04, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
El Jefe
Intro: "after Palpatine succeeded himself as Galactic Emperor" I don't like using the term "succeeded himself", something like "appointed himself" would be better.- Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 02:13, August 17, 2013 (UTC)
I'd like a little more context on Anakin and Stele in the intro.IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 01:56, August 17, 2013 (UTC)- Is that better? --LelalMekha (talk) 02:13, August 17, 2013 (UTC)
Dogma likes your articles
Is it necessary to have both of the appearances? It seems like the 2nd just contains the reprinting of the first. Otherwise, nice work.501st dogma(talk) 21:07, August 19, 2013 (UTC)- You're right, it's probably superfluous, and it looks clumsy anyway. I removed it. (And thanks, of course.) --LelalMekha (talk) 21:28, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
Cav
I think the term "notorious recipients" is a little too POV. Yes, it can be used to describe well-known individuals, but it also has negative connotations.- Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 10:30, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Replaced "notorious" with "well-known." --LelalMekha (talk) 12:13, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
I'd like to propose some minor rewording regarding the 20 BBY dating of the title's introduction. The dating itself in the Fact File can often be a little loopy, and although the entry on the Actis-class in the fourth issue does list 20 BBY as the date, it doesn't specifically say that the Actis-class was introduced in 20 BBY. My understanding is that everything in the entry is simply written from the timeline perspective of 20 BBY. For that reason, I would suggest saying "By 20 BBY" instead of "20 BBY or earlier" in the "establishedby" field of the infobox, and similarly saying "by 20 BBY" instead of "in 20 BBY" in the accompanying citation (ref 2). If you have another source that explicitly states that the Actis-class was introduced in 20 BBY, you're welcome to use it instead; this is just my recommendation if you're going to cite this entry of the new Fact File.- It does seem that you're right. After all, the same issue of the Fact File has a date of 32 BBY for its Tatooine entry, and Tatooine didn't suddenly appear out of the thin air in 32 BBY, did it? I tweaked the article as you suggested. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:27, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
"a branch of the Obroa-skai library": would articles for this specific branch and/or the main library deserve articles?CC7567 (talk) 03:24, September 11, 2013 (UTC)- The main Obroa-Skai library already had its own article, but I just didn't know it existed. The other one has just been created. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:27, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:12, September 21, 2013 (UTC)