Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tamo Lan

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Tamo Lan
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 501
        • 1.1.2.2 Ayrehead
        • 1.1.2.3 Winterz
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Tamo Lan

  • Nominated by: Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 21:31, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Shroud Team complete.

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 23:06, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
  2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:34, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 18:16, December 22, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:05, December 25, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:07, January 1, 2014 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Winterz (talk) 12:57, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Object

501
  • "..on the planets Baes Logia and Yavin 4..." New context is needed....
    • Done.
  • Body: Context on Bresnia?
    • Added.
  • The infobox picture makes it look like one of his hands has been replaced by a medical tool. Is that right? If so, it should be added to the body.
    • The bio and RPG stats mention nothing. Also, as a species trait, the Carosites are against cybernetic enhancement. Additionally, this picture shows a similar tool. If I had to guess, I'd say its a tool designed to slip over the hands of a Carosite. Either way, its a level of speculation I'm not going to delve into :P
  • Good work. 501st dogma(talk) 00:52, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
    • Thank you. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 22:31, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Could you split the P&T section so that there is an equipment section.Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:32, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
    • Splutted into that and a Skills and Abilities sections! - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 15:05, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
Winterz
  • After contemplating for a while on how to procceed here (since some cases could be arguable), I've concluded that you need to remove the "first appearance" from the Bts section since Cracken's Rebel Operatives (article), despite depicting a story, it is more of a report in the way it was delievered and as such, that's a "first mentioned". Fix it respectively in the Bts and Sources sections. (one alternative suggestion would be replacing the "appearance" wording for "featured") Winterz (talk) 21:06, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
    • Agreed, changed. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 22:07, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
      • Oh, I kind've misinterpreted parts of it. I have added respective templates to the sources section considering this development, let me know if you oppose them. ;) Winterz (talk) 22:37, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 12:57, January 13, 2014 (UTC)