Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Tal Anavere

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Tal Anavere
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Prepare to be savaged…
        • 1.1.2.2 Ho'Din
        • 1.1.2.3 Moffship
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Tal Anavere

  • Nominated by: Eyrezer 03:27, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:28, September 21, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ~SavageBOB sig 12:38, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
  3. --Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 23:16, September 27, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote This was good.—Tommy 9281 Tuesday, October 11, 2011, 16:24 UTC
  5. Inqvote Menkooroo 04:32, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 02:55, October 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Prepare to be savaged…
  • Would "pre-industrial" be an OK substitute for "pre-technological"? Even spears are technology, so I just wanted to check.
    • Possibly. "Pre-technological civilizations" is the wording used in the OS, so I went with that. --Eyrezer 11:02, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
      • Weird. Art itself is arguably a technology in an archaeological sense. But, yeah, guess you gotta go with the OS. ~SavageBOB sig 12:38, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
  • Does she have any skills worth noting (from her RPG stats)? ~SavageBOB sig 02:41, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
    • Added some skillz. --Eyrezer 11:02, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
Ho'Din
  • The intro and the body seem to slightly disagree --- the former says "Established herself as an art dealer," which seems a bit more accurate than "posed as an art dealer," since she was in fact dealing art. Can you reconcile the two statements?
  • Do you think the Obra-skai library is worth an article/redlink? Since we have various other library articles, it seems noteworthy enough. Let me know what you think. Good work. Menkooroo 15:42, October 9, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review, Menk. Should both be addressed now, although the library article could probably have a few more sources added to it. --Eyrezer 07:31, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
      • Thanks to Tranner's Vicendi, I now realize that there already was an article. My mistake. Menkooroo 04:32, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
Moffship
  • The end of the P&T is missing a reference.
  • Are there any appropriate Rebel Alliance categories into which Anavere could be added?
  • That's all. Good work. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:55, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
    • Cheers for the review, Tranner. Should both be addressed now. --Eyrezer 07:31, October 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:55, October 23, 2011 (UTC)