Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Taggart (Senate Guard)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Taggart (Senate Guard)

  • Nominated by: StarWarsFan327 (talk) 21:03, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 01:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 453 words (94 introduction, 322 body, 37 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 437 words (68 introduction, 330 body, 39 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ACvote Nice work, hope to see more! Lewisr (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Good stuff, excited for more Clone Wars stuff from you! Wok142 (talk) 17:41, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote CometSmudge (talk) 01:44, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
  4. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 01:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Wok
  • In the Intro, a few things will need some more contest: Clone Wars needs context as a conflict between the Galactic Republic and the Confederacy of Independent Systems, Mandalore also needs context as a planet, and Bonteri needs some form of context as well
  • Also in the Intro, the 20 BBY date for the events described would be good to add in
  • Slide 6 of the episode gallery has an indirect mention of Taggart, so the episode guide can be listed in sources. Wok142 (talk) 21:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
  • For the Equipment section, I would first say that you can remove "in combat" because Taggart wears the armor in situations where there isnt necessarily any fighting. Secondly, I think you can just simplify "faceplate filled in with a dark visor" to just "a dark visor." Wok142 (talk) 04:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Editor
  • Star Wars Encyclopedia: The Comprehensive Guide to the Star Wars Galaxy establishes him as a "notable" Senate Guard, should be reflected in article Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Forgot to add that. Fixed! StarWarsFan327 (talk) 12:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
      • I would slightly amend your usage in the body. Its not that Taggart is a notable human, but a notable senate guard. I can be notable among people who drink coffee in town, but that doesn't make me notable among all humans, no matter what my coworkers tell me :P Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
        • I reworded both the intro and the body making it clear he's a notable senate guard. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 11:07, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
          • Jumped in to make it clear it was being a guard overall that he was notable in, not that he was a notable captain Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
            • Thanks for the wording clarification. I see the difference between saying Taggart was a notable guard vs notable captain in the guard. How does it look now? StarWarsFan327 (talk) 11:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Lew
  • I don't believe that Satine's pronouns, or that Mandalore is a planet, are citable to the episode Lewisr (talk) 00:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Taggart is directly mentioned in the Senate Guards section, so I think you can just cut the human species reference in the infobox and just cite it the book itself Lewisr (talk) 00:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Since Taggart isn't mentioned in the Join the Battle you'll need a 'Based on corresponding data for Senate Guards' note. If you see here for example how to do that Lewisr (talk) 00:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
    • All corrected and I reworded the sentence about Satine. -StarWarsFan327 (talk) 12:13, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Last thing, I think for the PT section that you can cut the first sentence, and I kinda think the second sentence should be moved into the biography at the first mention of the Senate Guard, with mention of the Clone Wars and its context being moved to after "In 20 BBY". Hopefully that makes sense Lewisr (talk) 23:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 01:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC)