- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
TIE/sh shuttle
- Nominated by: Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: 972 words. :/
(2 ACs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
- Good work as always, Toprawa. Grand Moff Tranner
(Comlink) 03:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 00:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
--Eyrezer 21:17, 15 December 2008 (UTC)- Good work. IFYLOFD (And now, young Skywalker, you will die.) 03:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Read this as a wip, really came together. Surely you can stretch the BtS for a few more words. ;) Cull Tremayne 04:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Object
- From the Moffship of Grand Moff Tranner:
Just one thing: If you're not sure if a TIE shuttle appears in Dark Knight's Devilry, you should probably put the "Possible appearance" tag next to it in the "Appearances" list. Additionally, you might want to rephrase the info in the "History" section from that story - maybe add something like "A craft that appeared to be a TIE shuttle...", since the explanation is already in the BTS.Grand Moff Tranner(Comlink) 02:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well, the whole point of that BTS explanation is so I can properly assert that the Dark Knight's craft is indeed a TIE shuttle, which I don't think is too much of a stretch, without using weasel wording to say it "might be" something. This article is assuming that that craft is a TIE shuttle. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but I still say you should at least put the {{Pos}} tag next to the appearance in question. Since you are assuming the craft is a TIE shuttle. Grand Moff Tranner
(Comlink) 02:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- I don't mind putting the Pos tag, but would that also necessitate including the Marvel comic as a Pos? I think doing the latter would be bad. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:09, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but I still say you should at least put the {{Pos}} tag next to the appearance in question. Since you are assuming the craft is a TIE shuttle. Grand Moff Tranner
- Well, the whole point of that BTS explanation is so I can properly assert that the Dark Knight's craft is indeed a TIE shuttle, which I don't think is too much of a stretch, without using weasel wording to say it "might be" something. This article is assuming that that craft is a TIE shuttle. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
The CSWE actually uses a panel from Marvel 53 to illustrate the Boarding Craft, so you can reword your BTS to nail that down -- Darth Culator (Talk) 23:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)- Excellent. Good to know I was right if maybe for the wrong reason. BTS altered. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 05:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)