Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Symponik Nabooalla

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Symponik Nabooalla
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Return of the Jedi
        • 1.1.2.2 Moffship
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Symponik Nabooalla

  • Nominated by: MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 14:43, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Pour le barn-burner.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:00, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
  2. ACvoteVotar por Granero quemador.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 03:33, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Spectacular! Menkooroo 04:50, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
  4. —NAYAYEN 17:23, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:27, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Return of the Jedi
  • Infobox needs to be reloaded as a starter.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 04:56, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • Huh? Everything's there. I don't get it! :P MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 14:41, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
      • Something's not there. Reload it, and compare the diffs. :P —Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 16:34, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
        • I guess it's fixed now. :P MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 17:20, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
          • Not yet. You still didn't get it. :P —Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 17:21, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
            • Dude, I reloaded it...twice. XD I can't find anything. Go ahead and fix it and I'll see what you did. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 17:33, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
              • Done. According to this edit, you added it, and then removed it. Don't know what was up with that. :P —Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 17:41, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
                • Are you talking about the underscores? That's the only difference I see. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 19:15, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
                  • Yes. The original full template has the underscores, thus the infobox should always have those.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 20:59, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • There is a redlink in the intro now.
    • No there's not. ;)
  • I don't believe we should refer to this Gungan conductor as "Augie" throughout the article. We always refer to a person by their last name after their first mention, and I don't see why this should be any different, just because she has a nickname.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 21:59, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
    • Changed. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 19:11, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
Moffship
  • Correct me if I'm wrong, but we don't seem to have an established layout for song articles. Might I suggest breaking up the "Performances" section into a "Description" and a "History" section? Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:59, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
    • The article is currently following the same layout as "Mad About Me." And what would you propose go in the "Description" section? A summary of the piece like I've done in real world music articles? MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 03:50, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
      • After talking on IRC, I believe I understand what you're looking for. Has is it now? MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 23:05, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
  • In both the "Description" and the "History" sections, please clarify why Naboo needed to be freed. (In the latter, this would require mentioning the Trade Federation's invasion slightly sooner in that paragraph.) Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:42, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
    • Better? MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:08, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
  • Forgot to say this, but thanks for the review! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:08, February 28, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:27, February 29, 2012 (UTC)


Figured I'd better hurry up and get this up. January's almost over. Great Municipal Band is coming next. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 14:43, January 26, 2012 (UTC)

  • Any leads on Williams commenting on the rumour that it's based off of the Emperor's Theme? That's the only thing holding back my support. Menkooroo 02:16, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
    • Nope. Just some forums where people talk about it. I noticed the other day when I happened to play the two pieces consecutively on my trumpet (unintentionally, mind you), and realized they're not even the same notes. AGMB goes C D C, and the Emperor's Theme goes C Eb C. That's trumpet notes, btw. So yeah, I don't think it needs mentioning, as the rumor doesn't even ring true. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:16, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
      • Actually, I went ahead and added the info about the rumor and how it's not true. See what ya think. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:51, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
        • A bit of searching around dug up this interview (originally published in some magazine) with Ken Wannberg. It has a quote by Wannberg saying that the connection wasn't intended, which would probably be good to add as another reference for the Bts. —NAYAYEN 00:13, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
          • Awesome! I've added all the info I can glean from that interview into the Bts. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 15:16, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
  • I removed Category:Musical compositions and replaced it with Category:Patriotic and military songs. The latter is a subcategory of the first. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 15:04, February 13, 2012 (UTC)