Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Steadfast (Venator-class)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Steadfast (Venator-class)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

~~Duplicate links.~~
- This is a sofixit, but fixed myself.
  - It would be if this was the only issue, but here it's coupled with the other issues I pointed out as well. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Dangling participles: "Suffering extensive damage to its hull in the destroyer's oncoming fire, Grievous's ship docked with one...," "As his flagship, the Steadfast was commanded by Jedi Master Eeth Koth during the time of the Clone Wars."
- I definitely thought they were fine, given the size of the paragraph in the Commanders and crew section, but fixed.
  - The first example still exists. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
~~Does Grievous Intrigue identify Saleucami as a planet?~~ UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Cited to HC 33.
~~Though the original USW introduced the name, New Edition should be cited instead if it still contains it.~~ UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Done. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 14:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

(Review note) "Commander" should be linked to commanding officer rather than commander when referring to someone in a military leaderership position who doesn't hold the rank of commander (although I've replaced the word with "commanded by" in my copy-edit)
- Noted.
~~Either "s's" or "s'" should be used here; the format should be consistent within an article~~
~~Except for maybe the first instance of the word in the intro, I would remove all instances of "managed" from the article since they're not necessary~~ OOM 224 10:38, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
~~"Flagship" is intro-/category-exclusive~~ OOM 224 10:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- All done. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 04:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
  - There's still the "s's"/"s'" issue in the article body, which is also lacking the mention of flagship OOM 224 08:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
    - Done. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 13:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

The references used to source the technical specifications in the infobox currently don't state the Complete Vehicles, New Edition is where we get the number for each. I believe I raised this issue in a previous nomination, but Redeemer also does this. These refs should clarify that the number comes from that source, as well, instead of just stating that Venators have that many.
~~We should refrain from using parentheses in prose.~~ MasterFred(talk) 06:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Both of these were suggestions by Tommy on Redeemer that I carried over to most of my starship noms. However, I have changed both in a hurry before work so they might be more suitable now. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 11:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
  - The new wording of the references can now be interpretted as either the episode or the book giving the number.
  - The body now no longer states how many were on port and starboard each. MasterFred(talk) 00:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
    - How's that for both? Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 00:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 01:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Got any issues with this copy-edit? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Nope. It's fine. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 15:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)