Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Skirmish at the ancient shrine

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Skirmish at the ancient shrine
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Cav
        • 1.1.2.2 Exiled Jedi
        • 1.1.2.3 Attack of the Clone
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Skirmish at the ancient shrine

  • Nominated by: Cade Calrayn GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit 22:51, June 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Time to continue Project Hero, now that I'm mostly done with that other project.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 19:05, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 00:00, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
  3. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 02:17, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
  4. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 20:37, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
    • Vote restored. CC7567 (talk) 02:39, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Nice.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 07:39, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Cav
  • Date is infobox exclusive.
    • Done.
  • You mention war droids in the main article, but they are not reflected as combatants in the infobox.
    • Done.
  • Approaching the Flesh Raider Ravager Chieftain, the Jedi was shocked to hear the native say the word Jeehd-ay—the Flesh Raider could speak. - Some further elaboration on why a Flesh raider speaking is shocking is needed. Up until this point, while reading other articles, I had no clue that Flesh Raiders could not speak.
    • Bah.
  • You establish that Din knew the identity of Bengal Morr, but there is no pay-off in the article as to this info. Something in the aftermath is needed.
    • Alrighty.
  • When quote between two speakers, the dialogue template isn't needed; simply formatting the quote temple as I have done works. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 09:24, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
    • Woops. Must have written this before I knew that. Cade Calrayn GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit 14:03, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • I would mention Moorint and the scouting of the area in the prelude section.
    • Well, the fight section, but mentioned anyway.
  • You need to reference the 18 Flesh Raider adepts from the infobox somewhere in the main article.
    • Done: "where the apprentice found a group of over a dozen Flesh Raiders." And the next paragraph mentions that the Ravager Chieftain summons four additional subordinates.
  • "Morr had been presumed dead, but he now seemed to determine the Jedi Order." I'm not sure what you mean by this.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 14:33, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
    • Woops. Fixed. Cade Calrayn GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit 19:38, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • "the Council had sensed there": what Council?
    • The Jedi Council. Fixed.
  • As a note: † is usually only used in infoboxes for specific individuals, not groups like the 18 Flesh Raider Adepts. Also, please, please continue to work on linking—I still found it rather sporadic. CC7567 (talk) 21:11, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
    • Done. Cade Calrayn GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit 16:17, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry for the post-vote/post-approval objection, but why is the infobox for a Duel when the rest of the article treats it as a "skirmish," particularly the section naming? Ideally, everything should be consistent throughout the article; otherwise, it might be necessary to rename the article. Please clarify. CC7567 (talk) 23:54, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
    • Wow. I probably copied the infobox from the Duel in the Gnarls cave. It's been fixed. Cade Calrayn GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit 01:17, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • The "Flesh Raiders Adepts" (does that warrant a separate article?) is exclusive to the infobox, and the thing about the Force Adepts is exclusive to the intro. Please rectify somehow. CC7567 (talk) 01:29, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
    • Done. Cade Calrayn GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit 02:36, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Apologies, two more. First, your {{WebCite}} references should make use of the "archiveurl" and "archivedate" fields instead of linking to the archive.org page in "url." The url field should link to the original article (see the corrected reference here), whether it's available or not. Please rectify.
    • Fixed.
  • Also, while it's fine to use user pages like User:Cade Calrayn/Project Hero/Cite1 to help with remembering formatting, they should never be present in a mainspace article—the actual content needs to be in the article, not a transclusion of a user page. You can fix this by simply adding "SUBST:" to the templated links (ex. {{SUBST:User:Cade Calrayn/Project Hero/Cite1}}) once you've fixed them as stated in the previous objection. CC7567 (talk) 20:11, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
    • Done. It's been cleared from all other articles as well... annoyingly, SUBST: didn't seem to work on the User: namespace. Cade Calrayn GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit 20:46, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:39, August 3, 2012 (UTC)