Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Sith holocron (Kruskan) (second nomination)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Sith holocron (Kruskan)

  • Nominated by: grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 03:56, November 22, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Missed this was up for review while travelling over the past month. :(

(4 ACs/3 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 05:41, November 22, 2018 (UTC)
  2. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:56, November 28, 2018 (UTC)
  3. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 21:18, November 28, 2018 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Good job. Write more articles (Legends only). Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:21, December 15, 2018 (UTC)
  5. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 23:51, December 15, 2018 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Very nice. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 16:58, December 17, 2018 (UTC)
  7. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 21:07, December 17, 2018 (UTC)

Object

A bunch of nitpicks
  • Time could be linked earlier in the properties section
  • Are Kruskan's capital and Girawn's palace notable enough for articles?
    • I've created an article for Girawn's palace. I'm not sure the capital is notable enough, but I can create it if others feel it is. :) grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:49, November 27, 2018 (UTC)
  • Inconsistent italics in the BTS and the references and sources.
  • "shaped like a pulsing sphere" I'd use an alternate word to shaped since you've got the adjective there. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 10:33, November 22, 2018 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure I understand the concern over the use of "shaped" here, since that's what we are describing. Can you explain a little more? Thanks for the review! grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 18:49, November 27, 2018 (UTC)
      • Don't worry about it, I just realized that shape was a specific field in the infobox, so it's better to have the body address that as it currently does. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:56, November 28, 2018 (UTC)
QGJ
  • Ref 2 needs to be fully linked and given proper context. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 10:51, November 24, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • This article title shouldn't be considered conjectural, since the source literally calls this a "Sith holocron."
  • The article states outright that the holocron was hidden "three thousand years before the Battle of Yavin." Since that's literally what "3000 BBY" means, you really don't need the long reference note explaining what is already explicitly explained in the source, so I've just removed that.
    • Sure, I think I misunderstood the point raised on the AC review about the difference in the date as a request to clarify why the holocron must have been created prior. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:22, December 15, 2018 (UTC)
  • It seems like we've been kind of inconsistent about when and where exactly we use "Properties" for that section title. Some of the "artifact" status articles use them, while others do not. In the absence of a Layout Guide policy, it's my opinion that articles that are natural formations, such as lightsaber crystals and minerals, should use "Properties," while man-made items like holocrons should use "Description." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:48, December 14, 2018 (UTC)
    • Makes sense, changed to "Description." Thanks for the review! grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:22, December 15, 2018 (UTC)
Tommy
  • A minor thing, but in the infobox I think "Sith holocron" would fit better in the type parameter rather than model, as not all Sith holocrons were the same. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:57, December 16, 2018 (UTC)
    • Makes sense, switched it to type. :) grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:20, December 17, 2018 (UTC)
Imp

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:07, December 17, 2018 (UTC)