Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Shasfath Cluster

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Shasfath Cluster
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 QGJ
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Shasfath Cluster

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 19:13, December 19, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: May I present to you an article originally created by JustinGann.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:04, December 19, 2018 (UTC)
  2. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 14:00, December 25, 2018 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:54, January 3, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 15:26, January 5, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 17:07, January 6, 2019 (UTC)

Object

QGJ
  • Can you add the 3 ABY date for the Occupation of Bespin to the intro?
    • Added. Imperators II(Talk) 15:34, December 24, 2018 (UTC)
  • This article assumes the adventure scenario plays out as described. Can you elaborate on the alternative scenarios? Can the players visit the systems in different order, or can they skip the Shasfath Cluster altogether? QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 14:33, December 24, 2018 (UTC)
    • Hmm, not really. It's more of a given once the players are assigned the main mission of the adventure. I believe the major assumption is that the players actually do follow the mission. Imperators II(Talk) 15:34, December 24, 2018 (UTC)
      • So there's an option to refuse the mission completely? If yes, then it should be noted. If no, then I don't see the point for the RPG mechanics template, stating that "this section of the article assumes a specific path." There is no assumption to be made if the events described in the article always play out the same way for every group of players. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 07:27, December 25, 2018 (UTC)
        • Removed both the template and the BTS sentence. Imperators II(Talk) 10:55, December 25, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:07, January 6, 2019 (UTC)