Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Shadow Runner

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Shadow Runner

  • Nominated by: IFYLOFD (You will pay the price for your lack of vision!) 01:20, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Ees more Floyd, no?

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 17:32, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
  2. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 03:11, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Good work. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:41, January 14, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Nice job. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 01:16, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Great work.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:18, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Object

  1. Something very minor: For the commanders and crew section, I think it would be better if you remove the mention of the Starbreaker 12 and replace it with a mention of Hok and Timar's deaths when the Shadow Runner was destroyed. This bit of information seems more relevant to me. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 17:10, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
    • Addressed. —Unsigned comment by Ifindyourlackoffaithdisturbing (talk • contribs)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:51, January 20, 2010 (UTC)


  • I'm willing to bet that the new FAN limit rule is a cabalistic and malevolent attempt to make prolific writers move to the GAN page, flooding us with too many noms for us to handle, and thus making them seem superior :P. It looks like you've already started doing it. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 03:30, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
    • I'm not at liberty to discuss this matter. :P IFYLOFD (You will pay the price for your lack of vision!) 04:07, December 23, 2009 (UTC)