Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Sa'Kalla (movement)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Sa'Kalla (movement)

  • Nominated by: Mor9347 (talk) 13:08, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Sa'Kalla! Again!
  • Date Archived: 00:57, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 355 words (120 introduction, 211 body, 24 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 337 words (113 introduction, 198 body, 26 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:FFGAMES

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Wok142 (talk) 04:12, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
  2. CometSmudge (talk) 02:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
  3. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 04:57, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 05:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
  5. Booply (talk) 00:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Object

Wok
  • Is the movement more about supporting Sa'Kalla specifically or more about rebelling against the Empire? I thought it was more about Drabatans Against the Empire but the first sentence is worded in a way that makes it seem like the movement was more about getting a person out of imprisonment. If it indeed is more about anti-Imperial-ness with one of their goals being Sa'Kalla's freedom, I would suggest more explicitly establishing that the movement overall as about rejecting Imperial rule instead of just about the specific goal of freeing the singer from jail.
    • It's not explicitly stated the movement's goal is to free her, simply stating that it was organized in her name. I very slightly reworded the intro to show that. Mor9347 (talk) 01:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
  • In the intro, I think the second sentence is quite long and could be broken up into at least two, maybe even three sentences.
  • It would be best to include a date in the intro as well
  • Also in the intro, I think you should state that the movement threatened Imperial control specifically on Pipada
  • I'd like to see the History section reformatted to be two evenly-sized paragraphs as opposed to a short one, a big one, and another short one
  • I noticed on the Crackdown on Pipada page that martial law is linking to the redlink Insurgency on Pipada. If that is accurate, you should create that page and link it on this article. I also believe this should affect your Sa'Kalla nom. Wok142 (talk) 04:04, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
    • I don't see anything about "Insurgency on Pipada" on Dawn of Rebellion so I'm going to delete that redlink, I've addressed all other objects I believe. Mor9347 (talk) 01:42, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
spookly
  • Similar to the objection on Pipada Auditorium, Category:Outer Rim Territories organizations is applicable, and thus also requires the region being worked into the body (and sourced, if need be).—spookywillowwtalk 22:19, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
  • If this is being treated as conjectural, should the intro not be similar to "A Drabatan-led movement formed on…" rather than bolding the name Sa'Kalla? Bolding is usually reserved for confirmable names.
  • Missing image caption punctuation.
  • If there is no Legends equivalent, then canon needn't be indicated in the BTS.—spookywillowwtalk 03:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Comet
  • If "a movement organized in "Sa'Kalla's name" is the only indication of the name, then this might need a conjecture header, since I'm not sure if that's actually enough to say the movement was named after her. (Also looks like the article originally did have it).
  • In the intro between "killed on stage" and "the stadium erupted", I don't think a comma works there. I think you need to either split the sentence or add a conjunction. CometSmudge (talk) 00:45, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
    • Done with both! Mor9347 (talk) 02:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)