Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Republic Executive Directive 9302-84121

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Republic Executive Directive 9302-84121

  • Nominated by: Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 08:02, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I got bored. Surprisingly more difficult to write than I would have thought.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. —Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 20:26, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Nice work, as always. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 01:56, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Looks good to me.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 05:52, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ACvote JangFett (Talk) 19:14, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Cool. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:32, July 16, 2010 (UTC)

Object

From the Council Chambers:
  • "The conflict inspired the Office of the Supreme Chancellor, at the time occupied by Palpatine of Naboo,": Are you sure that the fact that Palpatine is from Naboo can be sourced to AOTC? I'm thinking it needs to be sourced to TPM.
    • Sourced it to NEC—it's a nice catch-all.
  • "Coinciding with the release of the film, all content on the site was removed and replaced with a message detailing the suspension of HoloNet News": The content wasn't removed; it's still there and accessible by clicking the Aurebesh "Archives" link at the bottom of the page. Please correct.
    • Fixed.
  • Otherwise, nice job. —Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 20:04, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Article requires a {{1st}} and/or {{1stm}} tag.
  • Can we do something with reference number 4? Like using our Insider template, or referencing a more specific article? That's a very generic, and dare I say unhelpful, link/reference. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:15, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
    • The tag has been added. As for the reference, I linked it to the series because the limited format is only reference-able to the entire series—no one article says "it's in a limited format" but the content and frequency of the entire series is what gives that information. Is this okay, or do you have any suggestions? Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 23:24, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
      • In that case, I've made a minor adjustment to the reference. Feel free to tweak to your liking. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:32, July 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:42, July 21, 2010 (UTC)


  • Not really an objection, but is there any reason why you opted to use the BBY format for the year, rather than the Great ReSynchronization format (since it is used in the broadcast)? Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 15:19, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • Because it seemed like the Wookieepedia standard. I can replace it however, or use both, if that's preferred. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 19:50, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
      • Well, I've never seen the GRS format used to denote the month and day, and then the BBY format to denote the year. In the infobox and intro, I think you should use the GRS format only (and pipelink the GRS year to 22 BBY, of course). Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 01:39, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
        • Okay I've switched to GrS in the infobox, an in the intro I've switched to GrS and added a parenthetical note that its 22 BBY, since that's the date used in the rest of the article, and that year's usually better identifiable as the start of the Clone Wars than its GrS analogue. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 01:54, July 15, 2010 (UTC)