Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Reaper (Executor-class)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Reaper (Executor-class)

• Nominated by: Lord Hydronium 05:50, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Ah yes, "Reaper".

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. I don't fear the reaper. Menkooroo 10:31, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
2. Reaper? I barely know her! Xicer9^(Combadge) 17:30, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
3. Nice job. You've won the Exy contest - so far. :p Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 19:53, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
4. Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 20:16, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
5. Please watch your linking, though. CC7567 ^(talk) 20:33, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Object

1. Can you give context on Rogue Squadron? Menkooroo 06:21, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
   • I'm torn between wanting an excuse to pad this out to FA length and my dislike of excessive context. :P I think the fact that they were an NR squadron says all that this article needs to cover, though. - Lord Hydronium 07:30, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
     • On second thought, I realized that I never really indicate what RS is. So I've added that. - Lord Hydronium 07:36, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
2. From the Moffship of Grand Moff Tranner:
   • I plan on doing a full review later on, but I was just reading through the Atlas and found a few things. First off, I can't seem to find the reference that the Reaper was an Exy; I only ever see it referred to as a Super Star Destroyer.
     • Identification from the picture.
       • Ah, I see your reasoning here.
   • Also, on page 209, there is additional information on the final battles/loss of the Reaper that is currently not in the article. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 15:58, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
     • Added. And that pushes me to 1,009 words, so thanks. How do I get this to the big leagues now? :P - Lord Hydronium 19:45, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 06:16, April 6, 2010 (UTC)