Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Rdava-bird

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Rdava-bird
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Xd1358
        • 1.1.2.2 Moffship
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Rdava-bird

  • Nominated by: Eyrezer 10:58, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Stackpole goodness?

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ~ SavageBob 05:15, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Biiird. 1358 (Talk) 21:28, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 22:44, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 09:30, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
  5. OLIOSTER (talk) 07:49, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Xd1358
  • Only one thing: I'm not sure, but as far as I know "Nature Preserve" should not be capitalized if you don't include "Vlassy" before it. 1358 (Talk) 13:30, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
    • Makes sense. --Eyrezer 21:22, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
Moffship
  • Aside from the fact that Stackpole created the rdava-bird and wrote Dark Tide II: Ruin, I don't see any reason to assume that the "colorful cloud of birds" is a group of rdava-birds, or even include the possibility in a BTS note. After all, I'm sure there are other species of bird present on Garqi. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:36, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
    • Hmm... but there is the fact that Stackpole wrote DT:R and created the rdava-birds. Why is it "aside" from that fact? --Eyrezer 05:35, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
      • Because I'm sure that the rdava-bird is not the only species of bird that can be found on Garqi. It's too speculative, regardless of who wrote the book. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 20:08, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
        • Removed. --Eyrezer 08:20, November 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 07:50, November 7, 2010 (UTC)