Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Rand Ko

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Rand Ko

  • Nominated by: Menkooroo 09:40, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Spoilers for the recently-released Legacy—War 2. They're pretty minor, but I thought I'd leave the majorspoiler template up for now just in case.

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:55, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 16:49, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:02, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 02:49, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 17:11, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Moffship
  • In the first paragraph of the bio, you mention that Ko was stationed on Borosk, and the ordering of the sentences implies that Ko was on Borosk before the battle. However, if I remember correctly, the comic doesn't state that Ko was on Borosk before the fight began - I believe it says that the world had changed hands more than once, which makes this unlikely. If this is the case, I would avoid saying anything like "Ko was stationed on Borosk;" rather, I would suggest that you introduce the conflict and the battle before stating that Ko was on the planet. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 21:23, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
    • That's a good point --- for all we know, he could have been called in from elsewhere to help defend the world or something. I've given it a rejig. I also added a little bit to the BTS based on further confirmation I got from Jan; check it out! Thanks for the review. Menkooroo 08:40, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 12:59, February 16, 2011 (UTC)


  • I filled in the "author" field for the citeweb template, since the citation seems to be referencing the specific post made by Randy, though I can see it's also drawing upon info from the next post by Duursema. You may want to cite each individual post separately if this is your intention. Otherwise it might be best to remove the author field data. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:07, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
    • You're right; it's always better to list the author. I've cited the individual posts separately now. Thanks for the tip! Menkooroo 03:19, February 13, 2011 (UTC)