- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Radiation Cannon
- Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I meant to nom this after I expanded it but needed to make those specific B1 pages first
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:FFGAMES
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 20:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his)
(talk) 20:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 04:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
OOM 224 21:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Object
Macaroni
Missing Mediacat.- Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Context for Battlefront, and both the game and game guide need their full release dates added.- The game needs a full date as well.
- Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- The game needs a full date as well.
The bts goes from discussing Legion, to Legends, and back to Legion. I think it would make more sense to group the bits on Legion.JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 15:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)I don't see a need to have a close-up of the image in the infobox, only for a larger version to be in the body. See WP:LG#Main image.JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 16:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)- Image in body changed, as noted on discord Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
OOM
Any progress on that image?- Nothing on art-station, and my attempt at reuploading looked worse. i've put in an image request Editoronthewiki (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Compound words should be hyphenated with en dashes (see WP:DASH)OOM 224 18:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)- Good? Editoronthewiki (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- "non-mounted" is fine with just a hyphen since "mounted" is only one word OOM 224 18:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed? Editoronthewiki (talk) 23:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Manoof
First off, apologies as I thought I reviewed this previously! I don't think we need to link the word "article" to that article since it's listed in the reference and source Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)- Removed Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Full article date should be noted. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)- Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
I think there's some other categories that could be applied Category:Personal heavy weaponry for example doesn't seem to be captured by the existing categories. Do we also need to have a category for separatist weapons? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)- Added the personal heavy weapon category, I don't think we need a CIS weapons category given that the E-5 blaster rifle/Legends and E-5 blaster rifle have been articles for years but don't have them Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Is it fair to say it had no adverse effects for all droids, not specifically battle droids? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)- Good? Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
UberSoldat
A quick search on the FFG site reveals another article that mentions the subject, one that predates the post currently documented.- Article updated Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is the product description on the box itself? If so, you can just cite the product itself instead of the product page. But either way, I'm going to ask for its removal from Sources. Reason: We've historically never listed such product pages under Sources e.g. X-Wing novel listings under X-wing starfighter page's Sources. UberSoldat93
(talk) 10:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Description isn't on box, but i have moved that link Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is the product description on the box itself? If so, you can just cite the product itself instead of the product page. But either way, I'm going to ask for its removal from Sources. Reason: We've historically never listed such product pages under Sources e.g. X-Wing novel listings under X-wing starfighter page's Sources. UberSoldat93
- Article updated Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Not a fan of the body image as it has a very tangential relation to the subject.UberSoldat93(talk) 08:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- I personally disagree, since there would otherwise be no other image to put there Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- There doesn't have to be an image all the time, and we should adding such images for the sake of it as they provide little to no benefit to readers. UberSoldat93
(talk) 07:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Removed Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- There doesn't have to be an image all the time, and we should adding such images for the sake of it as they provide little to no benefit to readers. UberSoldat93
- I personally disagree, since there would otherwise be no other image to put there Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Would like to see the "size" field filled out a la X-45 and IQA-11 Blaster Rifle.UberSoldat93(talk) 14:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Size field added Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
The outcome of this TC needs to be reflected in the article.UberSoldat93(talk) 10:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Already looks to be done Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- The article still says these are a specific model of the droid, when it was determined that it is not the case. UberSoldat93
(talk) 07:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, cleared up some wording Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- As mentioned before, it's not supposed to be taken as an official title, please avoid using the term as such. UberSoldat93
(talk) 18:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Better? Figured its important enough to brief include in BTS but that can be removed if you like Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's pretty much OOU terminology after all. UberSoldat93
(talk) 16:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's pretty much OOU terminology after all. UberSoldat93
- Better? Figured its important enough to brief include in BTS but that can be removed if you like Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- As mentioned before, it's not supposed to be taken as an official title, please avoid using the term as such. UberSoldat93
- Ah, cleared up some wording Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- The article still says these are a specific model of the droid, when it was determined that it is not the case. UberSoldat93
- Already looks to be done Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
New body image suggestion: B1 battle droids?UberSoldat93(talk) 18:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Would like to see the Legends subject's original name be documented in the BTS (What is it called in the original Battlefront? Does it differ from the name in the sequel?).UberSoldat93(talk) 20:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Name is same in sequel, article updated with original name Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Comments
- OOM has uploaded a better version of the infobox image, so that is taken care of. again, thank you OOM Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 07:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)