Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Radanthus Mandelatara

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Radanthus Mandelatara

  • Nominated by: StarsiderSWG (talk) 16:05, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Formerly attempted to make this comprehensive, but the word count went up.

(1 ACs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. I remember this from the CAN page. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:09, November 14, 2012 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 14:34, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
  3. Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 05:40, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:31, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object

CC-8
  • Nitpicking here, but in the last bio sentence you could add "remember something he had forgotten".
    • Fixed for Starsider.
  • In the P&T, the wording that "he was not immune to forgetting things" just seems like a weird way of wording it. I can't think of a better way to reword it, but give it a try.
  • In the Bts, I don't know what TRE files are, so some context on that would help. Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 09:12, December 10, 2012 (UTC)
    • Not a problem. I'll go ahead and fix these today I think. StarsiderSWG (talk) 15:48, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
      • Was also unaware what they were, made the effort to look them up. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:03, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • There are apparently four, maybe five, SWG strategy guides I figure this guy could potentially be named in (See Template:Swg). Is he really not in any of them? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:44, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
    • I feel like if one is not 100% sure about the article in question actually having more sources/appearances, no matter how likely the article is missing sources, it's better not to have it as an objection, maybe instead in the comments. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:11, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
      • No, it's the nominator's responsibility, which in this case appears to be falling to you, to be able to comprehensively research an article subject. Not being able to do so isn't justification for shunting a legitimate concern off to the Comments section so you don't have to deal with it. This only further validates in my mind the need to check these many strategy guides for this character's inclusion. This is GAN Rule 3: "…be sourced with all available sources and appearances." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:17, January 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

  • I changed the beginning of the bio while still trying to make it differently worded than the intro, as I personally felt like it flowed better. Feel free to change it back if you feel inclined. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:09, November 14, 2012 (UTC)
    • Looks fine to me! Thanks for the support. StarsiderSWG (talk) 00:35, November 15, 2012 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

ACvote Unaddressed objections for over two weeks. CC7567 (talk) 19:05, January 8, 2013 (UTC)
ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:33, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
I have fixed the objections for the nominator. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:03, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
  1. ACvote Reinstating the removal vote. Hanzo told me that he was not assuming responsibility of this nomination, so I consider my original objection on the 17th to be binding. That objection is now over two weeks old. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:35, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 05:16, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 09:21, February 3, 2013 (UTC)