Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/RT-56/X

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 RT-56/X
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 CC-8
      • 1.1.3 Comments

RT-56/X

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 07:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 02:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 610 words (125 introduction, 438 body, 47 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 610 words (122 introduction, 441 body, 47 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 02:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
  2. Fan26 (Talk) 17:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
  3. ACvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 15:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
  5. NBDani TeamFireballLogo-Collider(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 02:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Object

CC-8
  • I think the bio needs to specify that the con was repeated by the pair before going into the specific instance of it happening to the Rebels. Just to be more consistent with how the intro describes the process Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
    • The body is actually the one that follows the way the adventure presents the info more closely. But at the same time, I do not think that the intro is misleading about it, either - we know RT-56/X and Sangtwo attempted to pull off the con at least twice, which is all the intro says, really. (I've slightly tweaked the intro's wording to hopefully make it clearer). Imperators II(Talk) 08:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)