- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Pollillus/Legends
- Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 18:10, September 6, 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
- Tommy
Macaroni 18:50, September 7, 2018 (UTC)
- QuiGonJinn
(Talk) 17:44, September 16, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:08, September 27, 2018 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi (talk) 03:11, September 30, 2018 (UTC)
1358 (Talk) 17:24, September 30, 2018 (UTC)
Object
Tommy
The Twin Cities article says that that structure was Pollillus' capital. Can you please check this and, if correct, add it to the article.- Nothing in relevant HNN article identifies the Twin Cities as a capital. Removed from the Wook article.
- Great.
- Nothing in relevant HNN article identifies the Twin Cities as a capital. Removed from the Wook article.
The MoS says that the CSWECite template should only be used in the sources section "when a subject is referenced in an entry but does not have a specific entry of its own." I'm probably wrong, but wouldn't this apply to this article?TommyMacaroni 18:35, September 7, 2018 (UTC)
- The planet does have its own CSWE entry, which is why I'm not using {{CSWECite}} in Sources. Imperators II(Talk) 18:40, September 7, 2018 (UTC)
QGJ
A ref note should be constructed explaining how the 13:4:4 GrS date was converted into 22 BBY.QuiGonJinn(Talk) 12:53, September 14, 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, I don't think that's warranted here. The 22 BBY article itself—yes, that would definitely have to explain how the GrS date is translated into the BBY/ABY system. But here I'm using just the GrS date, and so a ref note explaining that "this is how the GrS date translates into BBY even though you, the reader, only see the GrS date" is kind of pointless. Besides, we even have a recent FA precedent for not adding the note to pipelinked GrS dates, and it's not like we actually need manual reference notes for pipelinked terms anyway. Imperators II(Talk) 15:31, September 16, 2018 (UTC)
Toprawa
The infobox's terrain field should specify "Landmasses"- Added. #NeverForgetDouglasIII Imperators II(Talk) 15:55, September 27, 2018 (UTC)
I'm guessing this sentence is based purely on the image and not any specific text from the source? In which case I would suggest just removing it. I'm pretty sure every planet has clouds, and it's probably not something we need to specify unless the text references it for a specific purpose: "White clouds were observed to form in the world's atmosphere."Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 13:39, September 27, 2018 (UTC)- *Sob* added. Imperators II(Talk) 15:55, September 27, 2018 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:24, September 30, 2018 (UTC)