- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Phatrong
- Nominated by: AV-6R7Crew Pit 06:39, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Revisiting one of my previous nominations.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
The bit about Embo doesn't feel like it belongs anywhere. :/ Imperators II(Talk) 16:01, September 1, 2016 (UTC)- Cwedin(talk) 07:18, September 12, 2016 (UTC)
IFYLOFD (Talk) 05:38, October 17, 2016 (UTC)- Cevan
(talk) 00:38, December 1, 2016 (UTC)
1358 (Talk) 13:38, April 25, 2017 (UTC)
Object
Imperators II
"Inhabitants" was in desperate need of a paragraph break. I guess Tope would say you should subsection it now. :PImperators II(Talk) 06:44, September 1, 2016 (UTC)Intro should include words about the planet's description and its government (and maybe affiliation)."Though they weren't monolithic some regions had more traditional structures with integrated militaries clovocs were common in several of the largest nations." - what's happening here?This article names Ekaqume a "house" while its own article identifies it as a clovoc. Which one is correct? (Currently, the first sentence of Locations contrasts "houses" and clovocs.)Last sentence of Locations is a bit longish. Can you rework it? Maybe put some of the info in Inhabitants?Imperators II(Talk) 07:04, September 1, 2016 (UTC)
Floyd
As per the Layout Guide, this article needs a History section. A lot of the information in Inhabitants would fit; as such, this article is going to need to be reworked rather thoroughly.IFYLOFD (Talk) 02:59, September 13, 2016 (UTC)
The Brave Goldfish
That bit about Embo really doesn't belong there. Also, the proposed quote from the comments could be added. Despite that it's a perfect article.- The Brave Goldfish (talk) 18:35, October 26, 2016 (EET)- Please note that what is provided in the comment section below is not an allowable quote for the article body per the Manual of Style. Imperators II(Talk) 16:54, October 26, 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, OK, so only Embo's bit should be edited. - The Brave Goldfish (talk) 11:26, October 27, 2016 (EET)
- The Embo bit is relevant to the subject, so it should stay, even if it does seem out of place. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 08:29, October 29, 2016 (UTC)
- Alright, Empo's bit can be kept. - The Brave Goldfish (talk) 11:58, October 29, 2016 (EET)
- The Embo bit is relevant to the subject, so it should stay, even if it does seem out of place. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 08:29, October 29, 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, OK, so only Embo's bit should be edited. - The Brave Goldfish (talk) 11:26, October 27, 2016 (EET)
- Please note that what is provided in the comment section below is not an allowable quote for the article body per the Manual of Style. Imperators II(Talk) 16:54, October 26, 2016 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 13:38, April 25, 2017 (UTC)