- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Pekt's clan
- Nominated by: Commander Code-8 Hello There! 13:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Pekt is one sick bastard
- WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Video Games
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- Well done. Corellian Premier
MTFBWY 15:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC) 
JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 18:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)- UberSoldat93
(talk) 07:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC) - LucaRoR (Talk) 13:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- OOM 224 17:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Object
Macaroni wants more CC-8 GANs
"ultimately being killed on the Avatar Orbital Platform in orbit around the planet, which he had designed" — This kinda implies that he designed the planet, instead of the platform.JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 03:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)- Addressed Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
UberSoldat
Since Pekt is a character in the game, wouldn't that count as an appearance of the clan as well?UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not of the opinion that appearances of individuals constitute appearances of their families, don't if there's a precedent on this though Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Then that means that a member of a group appearing doesn't count as an appearance of said group, which is actually against how they've been handled since the beginning. UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- The only way I can think of wording it to make the Bts consistent is something like "Pekt appeared in Galactic Battlegrounds and his clan was described in the game's databank," is that suitable? In addition does this mean that every other source that Pekt is mentioned in needs to be included, or does this only concern appearances? Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- First question: Sure. Second: No, only ones that mention the clan itself should be listed. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done Commander Code-8 Hello There! 02:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- First question: Sure. Second: No, only ones that mention the clan itself should be listed. UberSoldat93
- The only way I can think of wording it to make the Bts consistent is something like "Pekt appeared in Galactic Battlegrounds and his clan was described in the game's databank," is that suitable? In addition does this mean that every other source that Pekt is mentioned in needs to be included, or does this only concern appearances? Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Then that means that a member of a group appearing doesn't count as an appearance of said group, which is actually against how they've been handled since the beginning. UberSoldat93
- I'm not of the opinion that appearances of individuals constitute appearances of their families, don't if there's a precedent on this though Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Luca
I'm not 100% sure, but I think [Category:Slaver organizations] would fit.LucaRoR (Talk) 08:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yep, that works Commander Code-8 Hello There! 13:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)