Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Ord Janon

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Ord Janon
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Toprawa
        • 1.1.2.2 AV
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Ord Janon

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 12:11, October 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Ord Canon!

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Wait a minute… this isn't canon! Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:24, October 8, 2017 (UTC)
  2. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 21:57, October 11, 2017 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:24, October 12, 2017 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 02:22, October 13, 2017 (UTC)
  5. ACvote MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 20:18, October 20, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • Hate to say it, but I really think you should just remove the image. I don't think it adds anything to the article to show an image of something tangentially related at best to the article subject. In this case, an image of Dooku doesn't give us any certain illustrative insight into Ord Janon. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:58, October 12, 2017 (UTC)
    • Fine by me. I can add an image of a The Essential Atlas map showing the Yuuzhan Vong attack on the Ord Janon system, but that's even more tangential. Imperators II(Talk) 20:49, October 12, 2017 (UTC)
AV
  • According to one of your notes, "planets having "Ord" as part of their names served as Galactic Republic outposts known as Ordnance/Regional Depots during the Pius Dea Era". Is the planets bit specific to your wording, or does TEA say that only planets were Ords? If the latter, could that be used to definitively say that Ord Janon is a planet? - Imperial Information Office AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:32, October 13, 2017 (UTC)
    • The Atlas doesn't indicate it's planets, specifically. The lead quote is where Ord Janon's classification is derived from. Imperators II(Talk) 19:22, October 13, 2017 (UTC)
      • Objection(s) overridden by AgriCorps 20:17, October 20, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 20:18, October 20, 2017 (UTC)