Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Nar Kreeta system/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Nar Kreeta system

  • Nominated by: Stake black msg 02:43, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Heartbreaking to nominate it at 900 words and not have it as a FA, but here's to hope the reviewing process will provide the remaining 100 words. Also, for WP:AST and the Barnburner!

(5 ACs/2 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 23:26, May 19, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ACvote All from me, good work, Stake. JangFett (Talk) 13:24, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 06:04, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
  4. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 21:01, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
  5. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:59, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
  6. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 16:07, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
  7. ACvote Sorry for the delay. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:51, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II
  1. Why u do the system, not the planet? :P
    • Per TEA and Online Companion, Nar Kreeta system is specifically not located in the Outer Rim Territories and is located in the Hutt Space instead. Imperators II(Talk) 16:40, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
      • Done. And... good question. I think the system is probably easier. Stake black msg 17:06, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
    • I suggest you use the TEA map image as the main article image, since the system itself technically does not appear on the JK:JA galaxy map. If it does, however, JA needs to be added as an appearance. Imperators II(Talk) 23:02, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
      • IMO it looked better and "more in-universe", but okay, switched. Stake black msg 00:38, April 26, 2013 (UTC)
    • From TEA you can tell more precisely when the system was attacked by Vong.
    • On a related note, please link to the corresponding Vong attack on the system. Imperators II(Talk) 07:21, April 26, 2013 (UTC)
Jangeth
Floyd
  • Need some context on the Disciples of Ragnos crisis.
    • K.
  • Some of the body reads more like a description of the planet than the system. You don't need quite so much detail. IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 04:57, May 16, 2013 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • Very minor, but please note that images should not be resized beyond their native format/size. That means that the infobox image's width parameter needs to be removed, so that the image is not stretched out.
    • Ok.
  • For the "History" quote, who exactly is speaking? The caption attributes it directly to "Jedi Praxeum records," which doesn't seem quote correct—that sounds like what the speaker is citing, not the speaker itself.
    • It's unspecified. Check it out in the first seconds of the video. Stake black msg 17:38, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
      • It looks like there's an image of a protocol droid next to the text, on the right side. Would that be attributable as the speaker? CC7567 (talk) 06:31, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
        • The video's audio was silenced, but actually the droid only speaks the "Master Katarn..." bit. Stake black msg 22:55, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
  • I'll take another look once these are addressed. CC7567 (talk) 21:02, May 25, 2013 (UTC)
Good God Y'all
  • Hey Stake, I don't think it's necessary to source humans as habitants twice in the infobox, wouldn't you agree? Winterz (talk) 19:42, June 1, 2013 (UTC)

Objection(s) overridden by AgriCorps 18:00, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

    • Well, to me it does no harm, as it improves verificability. Is there any rule against it, though? Stake black msg 16:34, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
      • When it's not needed to prove a point you should prevent the overcrop of refs. Or if you're trying to prove a point by using 2 refs, then one should carry a sort of explanation. Winterz (talk) 14:14, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
        • Could you point me to a rule or precedent for this? Sorry, I really think it's unnecessary to remove a reference for aesthetical reasons. Stake black msg 17:41, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Although we don't have a literal layout for star system articles yet, by precedent they have been following the planet layout. As such, population info really doesn't belong in the "Description" section. That belongs most appropriately in an "Inhabitants" section or, alternatively, it may be worked into the "History" section.
    • Okie dokie.
      • Please look at the LG to see the correct ordering for these sections. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:48, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
        • Done. Stake black msg 18:15, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
          • Since you just exported an entire section down below the History, you should now check for linking issues -- double links, subjects no longer linked to upon first mention, etc. I can see at least one that needs to be revised. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:46, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
  • According to our article, the "Disciples of Ragnos crisis" is a conjectural title, so referring to it in this formal manner is not correct. It could not have become known as this if it's conjectural: "amidst the short-lived conflict known as the Disciples of Ragnos crisis" Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:22, June 8, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:00, July 8, 2013 (UTC)


It's weird. The TEA entry on Nar Kreeta says it was Vongformed, but the Vong expansion map shows them as passing near the system but the system itself isn't highlighted (an indication the Vong attacked it). This could mean that the Nar Kreeta system was dominated without putting up a fight. What do you think, Imperators? Stake black msg 16:11, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

  • Umm, in the map on page 219 ("Collapse of the Core") of TEA the Nar Kreeta system is highlighted. Imperators II(Talk) 12:43, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
    • You're right, thanks for spotting. Stake black msg 16:24, May 9, 2013 (UTC)