- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
NTB-630 naval bomber
- Nominated by: Clone Commander Lee Talk 19:05, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Should be a CA, now a GAnom
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
- I loves me some starships! <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 18:32, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
Menkooroo 11:03, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
Kilson(Let's have a chat) 11:16, June 22, 2011 (UTC)- Imperators II(Talk) 20:29, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
CC7567 (talk) 20:16, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Kilson
Reload the Infobox. Also, you should fill in the "Engines" and "Crew" fields of the Infobox.- Done. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:24, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
In the Intro you say, "the NTB-630 was better armed than the similar PTB-625 planetary bomber." However, in the Characteristics section, you say, "It was therefore more maneuverable than the PTB-625," You can see what you're saying here is different. Which is correct?- Both --> Fixed. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:14, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
I agree with Menkooroo, you need to add the "better armed" part to the Characteristics as well.Kilson(Let's have a chat) 11:57, June 21, 2011 (UTC)- Done. Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:53, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Both --> Fixed. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:14, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
You might as well merge the Role section with the Characteristics section because the Role section is very small and you repeat some of the same stuff you said in the Characteristics section. Don't worry, I think you'll still be over 250 words if you do so.- Merged.
Since you mentioned the Battle of Crombach Nebula in the Intro, you must also mention it in the History section.- Done.
- Otherwise, good job Lee. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 03:45, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:14, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
Omicron
in the Role section, you say it's used to attack the enemies "greater" ships. That sounds weird, maybe change it to "capital" or "large". <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 04:37, June 20, 2011 (UTC)- Section merged and resolved the problem. Thanks for the review. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:14, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
Bomber? I barely know her!
Just one: The intro says that it's better armed and more maneuverable than the PTB-625, but the body leaves out the better-armed part. The body says that it's better armed than the ARC-170, but not than the PTB-625. Can you put that in the body?Menkooroo 08:32, June 21, 2011 (UTC)- Done. Thank you. Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:53, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
The article's intro and body never makes it clear that the bomber could be piloted, which is some rather necessary info. Also, the fact that it had two engines is exclusive to the infobox.CC7567 (talk) 01:10, June 24, 2011 (UTC)- Both adressed. Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:39, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 20:16, June 27, 2011 (UTC)