Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/NT-311

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

NT-311

  • Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 19:31, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: CA to GA project. Never thought I'd be forced to do this.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Kilson(Let's have a chat) 21:46, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
  2. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 12:55, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
  3. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:15, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 14:27, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 03:04, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Kilson
  • Could you give some context to the "planetary coverage" mentioned in the Bio. This sounds like an in-game statistic.
    • Nope, it is mentioned in his in-universe information, and no real context given.
      • Fair enough
  • "The 501st engaged the Rebel troopers defending the Tantive IV in battle. The battle ended as a victory for the 501st Legion and with the capture of Senator Organa." You can probably combine these two sentences to improve the article's flow.
    • Alright.
  • The Stormtrooper Databank entry states that, "Stormtroopers were totally loyal to the Empire and cannot be bribed, seduced or blackmailed." You could probably incorporate something similar into the P&t section.
  • That's all I have, nice job. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 20:56, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • "NT-311 was completely loyal to the Empire, and could not be bribed, seduced, or blackmailed." I'm a little hesitant that we can assume this, since this is sourced to a DB entry that doesn't specifically mention NT-311. Yes, he's a stormtrooper, but that doesn't mean that we can assume that he has a "good" stormtrooper's traits. Is there a better source for this that specifically mentions him? If not, I think it might be too much to assume, even given the fact that he's a stormtrooper. CC7567 (talk) 08:01, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • To be honest, I myself doubted that this could be assumed. Hanzo Hasashi 14:09, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:04, May 8, 2011 (UTC)


  • On the CA nom, Darth Morrt wrote the objection, His card mentions planetary coverage and his power is boosted while on Tatooine. So I wrote that he was among the stormies who went down to Tatooine afterward. Is that solid enough evidence he was indeed on Tatooine? Hanzo Hasashi 19:31, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
    • It's a bit too speculative. I'd say mention what the card says in the BTS, but remove any reference to Threepio and Artoo in both the bio and the BTS. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 21:06, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
      • I sort of thought the same way, will change. Hanzo Hasashi 21:35, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
  • If this passes, it will be the first good article for an obscure character created by the JKTCG. :) Hanzo Hasashi 19:42, April 28, 2011 (UTC)