- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Moogan Tea
- Nominated by: Immi Thrax
(talk) 06:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC) - Nomination comments: MoOoOoogan Tea
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:GE, WP:NOVELS
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- Dentface (talk) 07:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 17:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his)
(talk) 02:33, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
MasterFred(talk) 09:11, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Object
Dent
Regarding the paragraph about Padmé, does Thrawn: Alliances as a source explicitly say that she is human?Dentface (talk) 04:33, 31 August 2021 (UTC)- After doublechecking, yes, it does! Thanks for raising that point. Immi Thrax
(talk) 08:17, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- After doublechecking, yes, it does! Thanks for raising that point. Immi Thrax
Pasta Tea :P
Outer Rim should not be mentioned in the infobox.- I'll come back to this one; discussing the fields in the food infobox on Discord. Immi Thrax
(talk) 05:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC) - The infobox discussion wasn't clearly resolved, so I've removed the Outer Rim since it doesn't match the current term "homeworld." Immi Thrax
(talk) 21:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- I'll come back to this one; discussing the fields in the food infobox on Discord. Immi Thrax
Duplicate refs in the description.- Fixed! Immi Thrax
(talk) 05:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed! Immi Thrax
Bts should mention the episode's season and the number of episode in that season.- Done! Immi Thrax
(talk) 05:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Done! Immi Thrax
Why the Falernum note? Seems unneeded.- Cut it. Immi Thrax
(talk) 05:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Cut it. Immi Thrax
Bts could also use some subsectioning.JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 04:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)- How is it now? Immi Thrax
(talk) 05:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- How is it now? Immi Thrax
"When Moogan Tea and Black Spire Brew were first pictured" -- I'd specify where they were pictured.- Done! Immi Thrax
(talk) 21:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- Done! Immi Thrax
"The non-canon video game expansion The Sims 4 Star Wars: Journey to Batuu also mistakenly depicts Moogan Tea and Black Spire Brew with the other's appearance." -- It's unclear to me which drink is mistakenly depicted by which. Were they switched?JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 20:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC)- Is it clear now? Immi Thrax
(talk) 21:11, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yup.
- Is it clear now? Immi Thrax
Missing a {{Mediacat}}.JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 22:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)- Totally forgot to add that! Must've been distracted going "pasta... tea?!" :P (Actually it's because I forgot my note to self to fix the image category caps. Fixed now!) Immi Thrax
(talk) 22:59, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- Totally forgot to add that! Must've been distracted going "pasta... tea?!" :P (Actually it's because I forgot my note to self to fix the image category caps. Fixed now!) Immi Thrax
UberSoldat
I do think it's redundant stating that the article assumes the drinks are different when you later identify a source that explicitly names them separately.UberSoldat93(talk) 12:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- How would you like that addressed? Simply delete the sentence "Although the two beverages have shared a name, this article has treated them as separate subjects due to their differing characteristics and divergent history."? Immi Thrax
(talk) 18:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Indeed. UberSoldat93
(talk) 19:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Removed that. How do you feel about the note re: Temple Challenge, "This article has assumed that its subject and the drink in that episode are not the same subject."? Immi Thrax
(talk) 20:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- After reading it I'm confused about what it's actually trying to say, some rewording would be appreciated. Also, the air date in that section needs another source, it's not directly supported by the current source. UberSoldat93
(talk) 19:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Fix the date sourcing and reworded. Immi Thrax
(she/her) (talk) 23:19, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- That first statement is still in the article. UberSoldat93
(talk) 09:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Re-removed it--apparently that edit didn't save. Immi Thrax
(she/her) (talk) 22:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Re-removed it--apparently that edit didn't save. Immi Thrax
- That first statement is still in the article. UberSoldat93
- Fix the date sourcing and reworded. Immi Thrax
- After reading it I'm confused about what it's actually trying to say, some rewording would be appreciated. Also, the air date in that section needs another source, it's not directly supported by the current source. UberSoldat93
- Removed that. How do you feel about the note re: Temple Challenge, "This article has assumed that its subject and the drink in that episode are not the same subject."? Immi Thrax
- Indeed. UberSoldat93
- How would you like that addressed? Simply delete the sentence "Although the two beverages have shared a name, this article has treated them as separate subjects due to their differing characteristics and divergent history."? Immi Thrax
Comments
- I feel like a {{Ret}} is called for since Ardees Beverage was retroactively made a separate thing, but where to put it? Immi Thrax
(talk) 06:37, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- Not really sure if a retcon appearance qualifies. Addressing it in the BTS like you have is sufficient in my opinion. Dentface (talk) 07:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- {{Ret}} is used to signify an appearance that was retroactively established to be the subject, like Puck Naeco/Legends. I don't think there's a place for it here. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 04:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback! :) Immi Thrax
(talk) 05:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Not really sure if a retcon appearance qualifies. Addressing it in the BTS like you have is sufficient in my opinion. Dentface (talk) 07:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Just pointing out that the article is currently above 1000 words. UberSoldat93
(talk) 11:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Was mistaken. UberSoldat93
(talk) 11:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Was mistaken. UberSoldat93
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 12:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)