Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Metalorn

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Metalorn
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Imp
        • 1.1.2.2 Anil
        • 1.1.2.3 Lew
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Metalorn

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 22:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 02:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 972 words (161 introduction, 745 body, 66 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:AST, WP:FFGAMES, WP:NOVELS, WP:THR

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Fabulous OOM 224 (he/him) 13:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
  2. ACvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:13, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 02:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
  5. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 02:58, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Object

Imp
  • Please move the Foundry of the Confederacy info—which is historical info—from Description to History.
  • Assuming that the previous year relative to a point during what later became known as "200 BBY" must have necessarily been in 201 BBY is an ABY-centric fallacy. :P The start and end points of whatever dating system was used by the time of Vow's events haven't been established to coincide with those of the BBY/ABY dating system. Imperators II(Talk) 18:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
    • Both addressed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 10:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Anil
  • Does any of the sources use the preposition "on" for the planet like it's used in the article? Just asking to make sure if we can assume it's terrestrial. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
    • Sorted. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 11:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Per precedent, is it possible to use the Character Encyclopedia's 2021 edition in references instead? TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 13:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
    • Yup, done. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 20:13, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Lew
  • Star Wars: Character Encyclopedia, Updated and Expanded Edition doesn't place Skako in the Core or establish it as an ecumenopolis Lewisr (talk) 04:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Mon Mothma is only mentioned in the quote caption under the GCW section, can we get some context for her (as well as a link added) or a mention in the body please? Lewisr (talk) 05:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
    • Both addressed. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 21:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Comments

  • This may be for a wider discussion, but I'm not really the biggest fan of separating the main regions and Slice. In my opinion, it should be written like this "Mid Rim Territories (the Slice)" in the infobox, since the Slice and those other ones are "sub-regions" to a degree. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 17:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
    • Uh, what source supports that? In Legends they were strictly independent parallel systems, and from what I've seen the case seems to be same in Canon as well. Imperators II(Talk) 18:42, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)