- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Magus
- Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:25, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: A return to the burner!
(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
Support
Winterz (talk) 18:15, March 10, 2014 (UTC)
Cade 
Calrayn 10:39, March 12, 2014 (UTC)- Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:48, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:49, March 14, 2014 (UTC)- Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 01:29, March 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 21:29, March 16, 2014 (UTC)
Object
In the intro, "The Magus were a peaceful non-sentient species of animal", there you seem to shift from plural to singular form, fix it. Also Magus needs to be decapitalized there.- Done I think. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:01, March 1, 2014 (UTC)
Does the source use the word "Peaceful"? I mean, how you described their hunting methods and the simple fact that they're predators make one think :P- Weirdly enough it does. It seemed strange to me to0. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:01, March 1, 2014 (UTC)
58 needs to be in written form in the body, sir.Winterz (talk) 01:35, February 16, 2014 (UTC)- Fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:01, March 1, 2014 (UTC)
Cav
Magus were a species of non-sentient browsers - is "browsers" the correct term here?- Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 09:05, February 27, 2014 (UTC)
- It's the term used in the source, so apparently so. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:46, March 10, 2014 (UTC)
Toprawa
I find it curious that you use "magus" as both the singular and plural form of the species name. Does the source support this? In addition, you alternate between "the magus" and just "magus" in the plural form. Why?Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:48, March 13, 2014 (UTC)- Changed it to consistently just be Magus not the Magus. The source does use it as both singular and plural. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:22, March 14, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:29, March 16, 2014 (UTC)