Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/M2-M5

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

M2-M5

• Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 00:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: And for my next Twilight Company member, I give you a sarcastic droid, because we don't have enough of those in Star Wars.
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS, WP:SWBF

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:43, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
2. OOM 224 15:33, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
3. — Samonic 13:06, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
4. 1358 ^(Talk) 12:20, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
5. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Object

OOM

• Preliminaries
  • There's a bit of a disconnect in the date ref. You've established the main timeframe of the novel, and that's all fine and dandy, but then it kind of just jumps to saying M2-M5 must have been destroyed at that time as well.
    • Does that clarify?
  • I've seen it a few times now, so you must just have missed it, but "Twilight Company" falls under the proper compound noun clause in WP:MOS#Linking.
    • I'm confused, none of the linking section mention proper nouns. What am I breaking here?
      • Specifically, I'm referring to this section "But do not link individual words within proper compound nouns (examples: [[Death]] [[Star]], [[Color|Azure]] [[Dianoga]] [[Cantina]], [[The galaxy|Galactic]] Empire, ''[[Bantha]]''-class assault shuttle)''" OOM 224 21:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
        • Ah, fixed. That's something I'll need to stop doing for all BTC articles :P Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 12:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
  • "explaining the matter to First Sergeant Hazram Namir when the pair talked about the issue" — the "talked about the issue" seems to be redundant to "explaining the matter." Can we do without it?
    • Removed.
  • Those two images have been used on like a dozen status articles by now, but I'm not complaining :P However, that first image's caption is a complete sentence as well.
    • Blame the lack of BTC related images :(. I'm never gonna get the hang of image caption punctuation.
  • "Namir told him to send a full report to Captain Micha Evon about the problem" — a bit of a disconnect here too, since there is no apparent link between this and the previous lines. To better convey the flow of events, I would use a word like "thus" here.
    • How does that look?
  • There's a few missing links, so it'd be great if you could spot them while addressing the other issues. OOM 224 21:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Did a sweep of the intro and bio. Hopefully got them all. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 19:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Z42-M5

• The information from the quote in "Damage assessment" about being unable to undertake repairs should probably be mentioned in the body.
• "After the pair then exchanged over M2-M5's use of time" Could you elaborate more on this?
• "He had a sardonic impression on the first sergeant" The wording here seems a little off to me; I presume it's M2-M5 that's being called sardonic here? If that's the case, I think "left an impression" would make that clearer. Zed42 (talk) 08:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
  • All addressed. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 11:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Vixus used TIE interceptors to my knowledge, not the standard TIEs. UberSoldat93 (talk) 04:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Amended. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 11:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)