Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Laudica

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Laudica

  • Nominated by: Menkooroo 14:41, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: 290 words!

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 00:31, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:33, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Jedi Kasra (comlink) 14:58, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 19:07, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:43, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Soresu
  • Some sort of date should be in the intro, probably 4 ABY for the palace thing.
    • Got it.
  • No skin colour entry for the infobox? SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 09:24, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
    • Is this a requirement? I always thought it was an editor's choice kind of thing. I've never liked it, nor used it in any of my previous noms... Menkooroo 03:05, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
      • I admit that I'm not the biggest fan of it either, but the noms above and below this one all have the field filled where possible. While it isn't specifically stated as a requirement, it falls into a "complete infobox" and "comprehensive coverage" thing <-- I've been thinking too much about CAN. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 08:59, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
        • I'm still hesitant to put it in... It's left blank in the manual of style example, despite using a character who's been pictorially represented, and I've never really known how to distinguish between the "light/fair/pale" that I've seen different articles use for caucasian Humans. Any thoughts/advice? Menkooroo 14:05, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
          • If I may, the inclusion of skin color in the infobox is not a requirement. Some choose to include the field; others choose not to. It all comes down to personal preference. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 15:51, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
            • Thanks for clearing that up. I'll probaby stop extrapolating it from images alone then; I never really liked doing it that much. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 00:31, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:43, July 23, 2010 (UTC)


  • Does Laudica actually appear in Episode VI? The CCG has, on occasion, created convincing images of characters that do not actually appear in the films. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 15:51, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
    • She does according to Premium-Era-real her databank entry on www.starwars.com (backup link not verified!) This Premium-Era-real website on Aveleyman.com (backup link not verified!) agrees, and uses a different image of her than the CCG one, which I can only assume comes from ROTJ. Menkooroo 00:00, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
      • Very well, but these can be tricky. It's always best to confirm the appearance by watching the movie. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:33, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
        • I found her! ~13:33 DVD (original theatrical release) timing, just after Oola falls into the pit. Holla! Menkooroo 00:43, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • May I ask how specifically Laudica appears in BTM? Is she just pictured in the ROTJ scene-by-scene? Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:14, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
    • Xicer hooked me up with that one --- there's a little blurb about her. Basically a restating of her CCG/databank info, but it mentions that she has "many" female friends in the underworld, which I've sourced in the article to BTM. Menkooroo 00:20, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
      • Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:43, July 23, 2010 (UTC)