- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Kler'terrian
- Nominated by: --Eyrezer 00:45, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
Support
- What is it with you and four-armed species? ;P ~ SavageBob 04:54, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Eyestalks! Eyestalks are more important than four-armness! --Skippy Farlstendoiro 12:50, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- I like to keep people guessing as to the true underlying pattern behind my articles. --Eyrezer 12:54, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 08:32, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:00, April 13, 2010 (UTC)- Chack Jadson (Talk) 20:31, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Cavalier One
(Squadron channel) 09:11, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
Object
- Skippy's not as worried about your penchant to four-armed species as he is about eyestalks
Bio: You mean that a Kler'terrian can have 360-degree vision if that individual consciously organizes his eyestalks in a specific pattern? Or do they have 360-degree vision all the time? Could they also move the eyestalks to look up and down?"kept a close eye over events" Is this an intended pun?- Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:27, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- I am known for puns, but here I'm just using a common phrase. As to the first question, the former. The "allowing" should be sufficient to indicate this. --Eyrezer 12:47, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Toprawa:
Does the source hyphenate "eye-stalk?" If not, I would suggest making it one word, which seems to be the most common real-world spelling: "they had three eye-stalks"Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:11, April 7, 2010 (UTC)- The original source only has the image. I've removed the hyphen. --Eyrezer 23:39, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
- No quotes whatsoever? Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 23:18, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Nope. Gor'telp doesn't speak in the adventure. --Eyrezer 23:39, April 12, 2010 (UTC)
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 09:15, April 14, 2010 (UTC)