Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Karsunn Nepto

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Karsunn Nepto

  • Nominated by: Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 08:56, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Attempting to bring the first page I ever edited to status! :)
  • Date Archived: 03:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 448 words (79 introduction, 211 body, 158 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 374 words (64 introduction, 179 body, 131 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:VG

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. Skifffy (talk) 01:17, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote OOM 224 20:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 18:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 00:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
  5. Booply (talk) 01:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

OOM
  • Missing confirmation of collecting the bounty and RSF interrogation from CSWE. Skifffy (talk) 22:25, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Added! thanks for reminding me! Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 02:20, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • If CSWE confirmed the outcome, then that source should be within the Gamemechanics segment. On that note, per WP:LG/IU, a full publication date for reference books isn't necessary (just the year is fine). OOM 224 09:00, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Resolved - apparently CSWE only says Fett claimed the bounty without specifying how or if Nepto was alive or dead, so the assumption is still needed, and the Gamemechanics notice refers to the BTS anyway, so all good. OOM 224 20:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • I highly doubt the extra ref is needed for the CSWE date given we'd have to had to miss that on a lot of other status articles, even recent, which all don't have it. We also don't list publishers for reference books without specific referential need.
  • I also don't see the value in having the CSWE sentence as a standalone one-sentence paragraph, which are generally avoided; should be merged up. I'm also a bit generally curious about the relevancy of it, given other status articles like Taron Malicos (and just status articles in general modern-times) don't usually list when certain information such as gender, death, species, etc. later gets revealed in sources. If it's simply to note that part of the article's assumptions note was later confirmed not-by-us by an official source, it should be merged more seamlessly with that note to make that clear.
  • (Review note): Would be good to be mindful of missing image caption punctuation for the ones that are sentences, and the strategy guide also had been missing. —spookywillowwtalk 01:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Addressed! Thank you for your edits too! Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 00:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Lew
  • There's a bit of underlinking on basis things like year, bounty, credits, Nikto. Would suggest making a run through and linking what can be Lewisr (talk) 19:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Added what I noticed and fixed an accidental link to a canon article Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 20:38, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 01:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)