Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Kaminoan Armorsmiths Ltd.

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Kaminoan Armorsmiths Ltd.
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support votes
      • 1.1.2 Objections
        • 1.1.2.1 Wok
        • 1.1.2.2 spookly
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Kaminoan Armorsmiths Ltd.

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 04:11, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 424 words (72 introduction, 281 body, 71 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 424 words (72 introduction, 281 body, 71 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ACvote Wok142 (talk) 18:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 06:00, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 13:23, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 03:54, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Wok
  • Kamino being a "location" in the infobox seems to not truly be present in the body, that could do with a quick mention. Wok142 (talk) 07:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
    • I did mention in the Organization section that their subsidiary is based there, but that's the only explicit mention of the company having any presence on Kamino, which is why I didn't mention it anywhere else CometSmudge (talk) 18:09, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
      • Ah I see... seems fine as is then. Wok142 (talk) 18:20, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • Hmm, I'm kinda not a huge fan of the single-paragraph subsection here: that's generally avoided whenever feasibly possible. In this case, it would look a lot cleaner, IMO, to merge the top two paragraphs of the Products due to them both being about armor, thus allowing for the sectioning to be removed. I do understand that the LG suggests some of these as subheaders, but the overwhelming precedent / history of objections left is to start using those only when there's enough content to fill each and/or to merge the recommended where possible to ensure two paragraphs per section, which this is sort of a mix of.—spookywillowwtalk 02:11, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
    • Merged the paragraphs and removed the sectioning CometSmudge (talk) 02:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:54, 20 March 2025 (UTC)