Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/KRONOS-327/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

KRONOS-327

  • Nominated by: Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 16:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Much thanks to CC7567 for putting up with my requests for help.

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Looking good, Grand Moff. CC7567 (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  2. Great work. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 21:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Graestan(Talk) 23:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  4. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 19:51, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
  5. --Darth tom Imperial Emblem (Imperial Intelligence) 12:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
  6. ACvote JOSEF MENGELE Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. The first sentence of the Characteristics section could probably be worded better; the "therefore" seems rather unnecessary; and the next couple sentences are a little choppy. Great job, Tran. Jonjedigrandmaster (Jedi Beacon) 17:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
    • Should be better now. Thanks for the review. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 19:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  2. Toprawa:
    • I would prefer only that you make a very brief BTS mention that the character was first mentioned in canon in the Visual Guide. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:37, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
      • Done. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 19:38, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


  • If you think that the article could use another image, I can screenshot something from the movie; however, it's up to you. CC7567 (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
    • I think another image would make the article too crowded, but I appreciate the offer. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 21:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
      • Okay; that's fine. CC7567 (talk) 21:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)