Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Jinn Reeso

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Jinn Reeso
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 501st
        • 1.1.2.2 Lee's charge
        • 1.1.2.3 emperor's advice
        • 1.1.2.4 Cadeth
        • 1.1.2.5 Toprawa
        • 1.1.2.6 Exiled Jedi
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Jinn Reeso

  • Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:22, June 12, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: After a failed CAN due to having to up-size and re-format the article, Reeso returns to a nomination page in all of his bluish-gray glory.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Qui-Gon Jinn Reeso. 501st dogma(talk) 21:34, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:07, June 19, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 17:13, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:19, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 21:37, August 4, 2014 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Mon Gazza needs context in the Bio. It also should be linked to while you're at it.
    • Added context. Whoops, didn't realize the link was missing. Fixed!
  • "... going up against the likes of fellow Podracer "Bullseye" Navior, the Sneevel Boles Roor, the Xamster Neva Kee, the Er'Kit Ody Mandrell, and the Nosaurian Clegg Holdfast sometime before..." This part of the sentence isn't really working. Is Navior the only other Podracer here? I would suggest changing it to something like this: "...going up against the likes of fellow Podracerss "Bullseye" Navior, Boles Roor, Neva Kee, Ody Mandrell, and Clegg Holdfast sometime before..." You don't need the species of each of the podracers.
    • That was supposed to be a plural, yes. For the species, though, I removed them for now, but I believe I was asked on a different article to include the species/other professions as extra context for the pilots in a similar sentence. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:51, June 13, 2014 (UTC)
      • Saying that they are pilots should be good enough.
  • I'm finding damage sponge to be a bit informal. Would you mind rephrasing it?
    • Done
  • " Star Wars: Episode I Racer: Prima's Official Strategy Guide; This race had to have taken place before the film's Boonta Race, as Neva Kee is present. Other sources have verified Kee disappeared during the Boonta and has not resurfaced since." First of all, it would be better if the ref went something like this at the beginning: "The Tatooine race from Star Wars: Episode I Racer: Prima's Official Strategy Guide had to have taken place before the film's Boonta Race, as Neva Kee is present." Also, the wording's a bit off at the end of the note, when it takes about Kee not reserfacing. Could you add at least one of the sources that verifies Kee's disappearance? Also, you need to change "the film" to Episode 1 : The Phantom Menace, for clarification.
    • Redid the reference now. Should I actually have a totally separate reference for the Databank article?
      • I don't think so. However, since the Databank is defunct, it would be better if you could use a different source. Is there a good alternative one? While we're talking about that reference, I don't think you should ref all of "Reeso also raced on the desert planet of Tatooine once, going up against ..... Boonta Eve Classic of 32 BBY on a course that sped through the Hutt Flats." to 2. Consider reffing the first bit that mentions the podracers to 3, the guide, with only the last part about the time of the race being reffed to 2. 501st dogma(talk) 18:00, June 14, 2014 (UTC)
        • Okay, I remember The New Essential Guide to Characters talking bout Kee a bit, but if I'm understanding what you're saying (Which I may not be), then the Guide is reffed to the pilots, while a second source to the Guide with the Extra info it sourced to the time? Or a ref to TNEGC to the time/Kee thing? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:07, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
          • Correct with the first one. 501st dogma(talk) 13:37, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
            • Does that look correct, now? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:04, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
  • Good work. 501st dogma(talk) 23:21, June 12, 2014 (UTC)
  • The info about the Hutt Flats is intro exclusive as well. 501st dogma(talk) 23:22, June 12, 2014 (UTC)
    • Fixed. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 03:51, June 13, 2014 (UTC)
Lee's charge
  • The stuff about his clothes should be moved to the equipment section. Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:53, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
    • Done. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:04, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
emperor's advice

*i see 2 "32 BBY in the intro. The 1st one is linked but not the 2nd. Mabye linking like that: 32 BBY could be good.Emperor Jarjarkine GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Senate Hall 21:45, June 23, 2014 (UTC)

    • Yah, that seems reasonable enough. Added a link the GSC in the body too. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:45, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
Cadeth
  • Next time, please reload your infobox before nominating. You still had the hide parameters, which haven't been necessary for quite a few months.
    • Whoops, missed those.
  • The linking in this article's pretty terrible. You missed species in both the intro and body, double-linked color in both places as well, and the BTS was full of duplicate links. Please pay closer attention to this.
    • Thought I did look over it for that. Sorry.
  • "sharing some of the fame" - what?
    • Reworded it a bit. Should make a bit more sense now.
  • Periods are followed by one space, not two or three. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 20:01, July 11, 2014 (UTC)
    • Yes, three is over the top. Two was taught in schools up until fairly recently, so...(Granted, while I do not know, three may have been a norm at once, too)? However, here, it seems that the extra spaces increase the page size, which is, yes, unnecessary. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 01:59, July 13, 2014 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • I find the adjective "decent" to come off as rather informal language here. Is this what the source actually says? "a decent set of attributes"
    • Looking it over, I think I wrote it a little POVish, making a conclusion on what I thought was a decent set of attributes. "Acceptable" and "average" are based upon conclusions made by comparing the vehicle to the other vehicles ingame. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:29, July 27, 2014 (UTC)
  • I don't know what you're going for with the mid-line template, but "Unlcensedstart" is not appropriate here. Episode I Racer was not released outside of the Lucas Licensing process. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:30, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
    • I think the old template was worded a bit differently (ambigstart instead of unlicencedstart). It's noting the fact that he replaces Mars Guo as part of the cheatcode. However, his status on Mon Gazza may not be 'canon,' although he does exist. Maybe it should be moved to the BtS?--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:58, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
      • It looks like you might be looking for this: {{Gamemechanics}} Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:12, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
        • Mmm, but strictly speaking, it has nothing to do with game completion whatsoever. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 04:04, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
          • Fine. If you're not going to use an advisory template, then you have a double reference in that paragraph. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 08:05, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
            • Sorry, but I don't think there's a template that makes sense, unfortunately. I removed the double reference, however. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:29, July 27, 2014 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
  • You refer to "Hutt Flats" with and without using a "the." Which is correct?
    • I'm not sure, but the Databank uses "The" Hutt Flats, so lets go with that.
  • Does the game or guide refer to the gray color as decals? If not, it could just be paint.--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 20:00, August 2, 2014 (UTC)
    • Yah, I guess they could've been painted on. I think was using decal as a synonym for logo or something. Although "logo" may technically not be the right word either. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 01:38, August 3, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:37, August 4, 2014 (UTC)