Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Jezzable

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Jezzable
    • 1.1 (5 ACs/3 Users/8 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Will this bewitched floozie seduce this humble newsie?
        • 1.1.2.2 Xicer
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Jezzable

  • Nominated by: Cylka-talk- 13:14, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Meet a true "floozie."

(5 ACs/3 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. Oh what's, a paperboy, to... doooooooooooo? Menkooroo 15:38, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
  2. ACvote I can't think of a clever comment. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 17:55, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Nice. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:01, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Hawt. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:09, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
  5. One guess as to who she's named after.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 22:04, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 20:58, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
  7. ACvote Best affiliation field. Grunny (talk) 09:31, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
  8. ACvote Per Grunny. 1358 (Talk) 16:25, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Will this bewitched floozie seduce this humble newsie?
  • Hey! Is it known how the bartender disarmed them? I'm not really sure if he shot them or just told them to stop.
    • It isn't said in the adventure. It just says that Gularg will tumble and slither into the fray and disarm. :P
  • Hmm... do you think it's appropriate to link to a wikipedia article within the IU portion of an article? Even if they're analogous, I don't think that a real-life handbag is the same as a SW one.
    • I suppose you're right. I was just linking so that male-dominated Wookieepedia would know what a clutch purse is. ;) Link removed.
  • Since we discussed the whole reprint thing on IRC, that's it! Great work. Menkooroo 14:06, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review. Cylka-talk- 15:29, October 13, 2010 (UTC)
Xicer
  • Ref #4 just leads to the article for the overall WEG roleplaying game. Were you trying to reference a specific book?
    • Thanks for catching that. All of the editions have been checked and reffed.
  • I know this is a bit nitpicky, but I think you'll have to provide sources for the dates for the Battle of Endor and HttE (the latter may be self-sourcing).
    • Sourced date for the Battle of Endor, HttE is self-sourcing.
  • Bts: "...one of the four adventure scenarios written for The Politics of Contraband..." Back cover of the book says there are five.
    • I may need new glasses :P Changed.
  • I think you should split any info from her character template into a different ref, since it's not technically part of the adventure proper. It's just supplementary information. We do the same thing with AJ stories/adventures (or at least we should be doing that). It's up to you how you want to do it, but it should be clear which ref is referring to background information provided by the book, as opposed to the actual events of the adventure.
    • Done.
  • It seems redundant to list the adventure book and Classic Adventures again in the Sources list, since Jezzable isn't mentioned outside of the section encompassing The Right Place .... We usually don't cite an AJ issue in the Sources list if the short story/adventure from it is already in the Appearances section. Since The Politics of Contraband and Classic Adventures are just adventure anthologies as opposed to actual sourcebooks, it really doesn't make them any different from the AJs.
    • Ok, I can see that. Removed.
  • Very unique topic! I love these kinds of articles. Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 04:28, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review and the tips. I haven't had too much experience with characters from the RPG adventures so this will definitely help me out in the future. Cylka-talk- 20:47, October 14, 2010 (UTC)
      • No problem. And thanks for putting up with me. =P Xicer9Atgar(Combadge) 20:58, October 14, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:27, October 16, 2010 (UTC)