- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Jardeen IV
- Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 14:32, August 29, 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
Support
- Fan26 (Talk) 14:35, August 29, 2019 (UTC)
- QuiGonJinn
(Talk) 08:58, August 30, 2019 (UTC) 
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:04, August 30, 2019 (UTC)- NaruHina Talk
02:30, August 31, 2019 (UTC) - Tommy Macaroni 14:46, August 31, 2019 (UTC)
- Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:25, September 4, 2019 (UTC)
Object
Tommy
You currently pipelink "Imperial Star Destroyer" to Imperial-class Star Destroyer/Legends. The Reliance page only lists it as a Star Destroyer, and if it's only referred to as an "Imperial Star Destroyer" in the text, I don't think we should assume its class. "Imperial Star Destroyer" could just refer to a Star Destroyer of the Empire, not necessarily an Imperial-class.Tommy Macaroni 17:25, August 29, 2019 (UTC)
- Our article for Imperial-class Star Destroyer gives "Imperial Star Destroyer" as a synonym, but until someone references that, I've gone ahead with your suggestion. Imperators II(Talk) 18:14, August 29, 2019 (UTC)
Toprawa
I don't think this wording quite works exactly. The original source says the Reliance was "assigned to" the training center on Jardeen IV, which we would naturally interpret as meaning that it's hanging in orbit over the planet in defense of the facility. It's not literally "stationed at" the facility like a person would be. Maybe I'm just splitting hairs, but I think it would be better to use the original source's phrasing or something quite similar: "...was stationed at the Jardeen IV Imperial Army training center."- Done. Imperators II(Talk) 10:58, September 3, 2019 (UTC)
We should be able to call this a terrestrial planet. Even if it's a waterworld, they are still nonetheless terrestrial planets.- We're extrapolating hard here, but added. Imperators II(Talk) 10:58, September 3, 2019 (UTC)
- It's not an extrapolation at all. The source refers to "the Imperial Army training center on Jardeen IV" — a training facility specifically for walkers, which are designed to operate on terrestrial surfaces. It's a straightforward deduction that the planet is therefore terrestrial in some form, particularly since the source says the training center is "on" the planet, as in not floating through its atmosphere. Anyways, you should add this term to the Description section as well. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:05, September 3, 2019 (UTC)
- Added. Imperators II(Talk) 14:27, September 4, 2019 (UTC)
- It's not an extrapolation at all. The source refers to "the Imperial Army training center on Jardeen IV" — a training facility specifically for walkers, which are designed to operate on terrestrial surfaces. It's a straightforward deduction that the planet is therefore terrestrial in some form, particularly since the source says the training center is "on" the planet, as in not floating through its atmosphere. Anyways, you should add this term to the Description section as well. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:05, September 3, 2019 (UTC)
- We're extrapolating hard here, but added. Imperators II(Talk) 10:58, September 3, 2019 (UTC)
- Reviewing note: "Imperial Star Destroyer" is the colloquial term for an Imperial-class Star Destroyer. Whenever a Legends source uses that, we should be identifying it as such and linking as appropriate, which I have added in my copy-edit. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:06, September 2, 2019 (UTC)
- I've added a source that actually says that to the Imperial Star Destroyer article. Imperators II(Talk) 10:58, September 3, 2019 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:32, September 5, 2019 (UTC)