Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Iziz defense tower

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Iziz defense tower

(+7)

Support

  1. What's in there? What's that? Only what I take with me? Um, okay…—Tommy Red lightsaber (There are no Jedi here) 21:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
  2. Your weapons, you will not need them.--Goodwood Redstarbird (Alliance Intelligence) 21:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
  3. Greyman(Talk) 21:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
  4. Chack Jadson (Talk) 16:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
  5. Seems very good, spotted a couple of spelling mistakes but fixed them, well written and fairly intresting - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 19:24, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
  6. Very interesting. - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 10:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
  7. Added a link to Drexl that was missing... Darth Xadún(Consult the Holocron) 20:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. From the squadron briefing of Cavalier One:
    • These emplacements were subsequently destroyed, when Iziz was virtually leveled, after the battle, however they would be replaced some fifty years later by a network of air defense towers. This sentence is a little jerky. Consider revising it for better clarity.
      • Addressed.
    • Upon sight of their approach, Queen Amanoa of Iziz instructed her servant Novar to order the Wave gunners to fire their turbolasers and ion cannons, in order to repel the attack. The use of the word "order" twice is this sentence is repetative. Consider rewording one of them.
      • Addressed.
    • Is there any reason why Gunner 1 and Gunner 4's names are italized during their first mention but not subsequently? - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 10:54, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
      • Yep, because it was the first mention of them, and I'm really not too inclined to create a stub for them. If you want them changed, I'll do it.—Tommy Red lightsaber (There are no Jedi here) 16:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
        • Nah, its good. I thought that was the reason, although I was thinking that articles could be made for them - we have articles for other minor characters, but it's your call. - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 10:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments

  • There is no BTS, because one would have to be forced. Please don't force me to make one, pleeeeease.—Tommy Red lightsaber (There are no Jedi here) 21:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Good thing that a BtS isn't a GAN requirement, then, lol :P Greyman(Talk) 21:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Two tiny issues: for the main quote, how can it be all caps when comics are always all caps? Bolded or something would be more presentable, IMHO. Also, could we get a {{1stID}} tag? And I do think a BtS would help the article, even if it just mentioned in what sources they appeared and what source named them, et cetra. Also, it might fall under the MoS requirement ( :-P ) though I'm not sure. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)