Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Imperious (Pellaeon-class)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Imperious (Pellaeon-class)

• Nominated by: Grunny ^(Talk) 04:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: First starship nom

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 01:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Cylka^-talk- 11:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
3. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 14:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Graestan^(Talk) 14:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
5. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Object

1. Last sentence of the bts should be sourced, methinks. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 10:28, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
   • Its kinda self sourcing, but added anyway :-). Grunny ^(Talk) 16:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
2. GRAESTAN'S BACK:
   • "It was in service to" is kind of awkward wording.
     • Reworded
   • No need to speak of the Imperious as Veed's flagship twice in the intro. Actually, that first sentence of the intro can be reworded. The first sentence of the intro doesn't have to try and sum up all the pertinent information, an intro to the intro of sorts, despite the many articles of status that have such sentences. It really just makes for redundancy, in my opinion.
     • Done :-).
   • The description section is a bit POVish, seemingly nostalgic for Star Destroyers.
     • Removed POVish wording and put only information in the LECG.
   • The shifting of alliance from Fel Empire to Sith Empire should be mentioned in the "Commanders and crew." Also, I believe that section should be retitled so as not to promise anything about a crew we know nothing of at present.
     • Mentioned and renamed section. Grunny ^(Talk) 04:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
   • Graestan^(Talk) 16:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
3. This is sort of a two-pronged objection. The last sentence of the BTS is pretty unrelated to the subject; however, there's a post by John Ostrander here (jfostrander01, 4/8/08 6:55am) in which he explains when naming that Imperious, he made something of a goof-up in forgetting this Imperious. Fit that in to give the comment about the other Imperious some on-topic context. - Lord Hydronium 04:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
   • Added. Thanks for finding that :-). Grunny ^(Talk) 06:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Toprawa:
   • This could use a little bit more context for dating. Did this take place after Caamas? How long after?: "Just three hours after the Massacre at Ossus" Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
     • How's it looking now. :-) Grunny ^(Talk) 07:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
       • Good. :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)