Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Imperial Mining Institute

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Imperial Mining Institute

  • Nominated by: Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 21:44, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Continuing the Tarkintown story.
  • Date Archived: 02:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 458 words (100 introduction, 299 body, 59 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 466 words (101 introduction, 292 body, 73 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Rebels

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ACvote Wok142 (talk) 07:35, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 02:17, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 21:09, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 02:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Wok
  • The mention of the "industrial efforts" is only present in the intro currently and can be added to the body. Production in general is mentioned but want to have "industry" explicitly included.
  • Does this page for analyst correspond to Ria Carr's occupation? If so that can be linked. Almost just did this myself because it seems like it probably is but no harm in leaving it as an objection here to be certain that this is an appropriate measure.
    • The analyst page seems like a generic catch-all for analysts given the appearances, so I'd say this corresponds. Added! Thanks for asking, no harm like you said. #teamwork - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 07:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
      • Awesome! And thanks for updating the appearances for the analyst page as well. Wok142 (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
  • In the bts, there is some specific formatting for Insider issues. You can look at Meckgin for an example of how it is commonly done. Wok142 (talk) 05:08, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
    • Changed. I think I did it right but let me know if not! And general note: thanks for the copy edit pass you did on the article. - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 07:32, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
      • Looks good! Wok142 (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
  • I've added "scientific" to the infobox type field based on the "scientific research agency" phrase in the opening sentence of the intro. If that makes sense, I would like to have that phrase included in the body as well, which currently does not mention science or agency. Scientist can be linked where you mention scientific. Wok142 (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • Checking; is the full Insider release date self-sourcing? Haven't checked, but do know on the overall its very rare for that magazine to source its own release dates.—spookywillowwtalk 23:18, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
    • Looks like it's not. I've edited the BTS to say June 2015, since that is self-sourcing. - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 02:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
      • Sorry, I should've been more clear. We do actually require full date for magazines (and comics, any repeat consistent installment sort of thing, per policy). I was more questioning that I didn't think it was self-sourcing and probably needed a separate reference to stay, not to necessarily tweak it out.—spookywillowwtalk 02:10, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
        • Got it. I used the source that's on the magazine issue's page. - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 02:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Lew
  • There's an applicable date for the story that can be added (and in the intro) Lewisr (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
  • I did briefly skim over the story so may have missed, but I didn't see a mention of the Outer Rim, which would need citing for the Lothal location and also Tarkin as governor of it, or that Lothal is referred to as a world/planet Lewisr (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
  • I personally don't see the need for this in the BTS 'It provided backstory[1] for the depiction of Tarkintown in the first season of the animated television series Star Wars Rebels.[4]' Lewisr (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
    • It was a bit of extra context to show how it fits into the overall meta storytelling of Star Wars Rebels, but I'm not married to it so I went ahead and removed it. - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 04:46, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
      • Fair, just typically we've been trying to cut down on these kind of things in BTS' unless there was a specific need to mention it Lewisr (talk) 20:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
  • If the Mining Corps is being treated as the Legends equivalent then its first mention should be noted in the BTS as well Lewisr (talk) 20:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:04, 11 April 2025 (UTC)