Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Imperial II-class Star Destroyer

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Imperial II-class Star Destroyer
    • 1.1 (0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 AV
        • 1.1.2.2 Ecks Dee
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Imperial II-class Star Destroyer

  • Nominated by: —Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 14:15, February 4, 2018 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: This is the culmination of Operation: Clean up Imperial II-class Star Destroyers.

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. --Vitus InfinitusTalk 15:59, February 4, 2018 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the vote and for fixing those errors!—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 16:02, February 4, 2018 (UTC)
      • Of course, great work with the operation and the article!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 19:51, February 4, 2018 (UTC)

Object

AV
  • Does the Imp-II not appear in TESB and RotJ? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:55, February 4, 2018 (UTC)
    • We have no source that says they do apart from Pablo's tweet, which can no longer be referenced due to the recent CT. You may want to look at this, which explains why the look of the bridge tower can't confirm the Imp II's class.—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 18:59, February 4, 2018 (UTC)
      • Understood. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 19:25, February 4, 2018 (UTC)
        • Nice!—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 19:26, February 4, 2018 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • Preliminary: For an article of this size, a longer introduction is definitely necessary.
    • Expanded using details from the rest of the article. Is that long enough?—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 16:06, February 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • The ventral hangar bay(s) should be mentioned in the characteristics section as well. 1358 (Talk) 15:25, February 10, 2018 (UTC)
    • Mentioned.—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 16:06, February 10, 2018 (UTC)

Comments

  • I know that this page is currently in Category:Pages with missing permanent archival links. I've tried to use [1] just as Toprawa suggested here, and I can get onto the page alright, but I'm stuck with an infinite loading bar once I try to search for [2] at the top. I have tried this on my Mac, my friend's Chromebook and my phone, whilst connected to my wifi, my work's wifi and my 4G. Does anyone have any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?—Tommuskq Imperial Emblem (TAKE A SEAT) 17:21, February 10, 2018 (UTC)
  • Removing per nominator request as article exceeds 1,000 words, making it ineligible for GA status. 1358 (Talk) 19:30, February 10, 2018 (UTC)