Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Hobin Carsamba

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Hobin Carsamba
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Floyd
        • 1.1.2.2 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Hobin Carsamba

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:57, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: A brief break from Leia before I get round to finishing Junn.

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote I put the video game under the Non-canon appearances subsection per the new addition to WP:LG. Imperators II(Talk) 11:53, September 18, 2016 (UTC)
  2. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 23:43, September 19, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Cevan IMPpress (talk) 17:48, October 24, 2016 (UTC)
  4. In the absence of a response from Toprawa, I'm voting in favor. - Pyke syndicate AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:21, February 7, 2017 (UTC)
  5. Not a fan of the three separate paragraphs in the Bts, but I see the three distinct topics, so I'll let it slide. :P MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 05:28, August 12, 2017 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:29, August 23, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Floyd
  • This is one case where I don't think the Bio needs to be subsectioned. You've only got a few really short paragraphs. IFYLOFD (Talk) 23:18, September 19, 2016 (UTC)
    • It still looks a little chunky in Wikia skin, but removed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:29, September 19, 2016 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • We implemented GAN Rule 14 to make sure we never have another image like the one currently found in this article's infobox. I realize it's being cropped down, but there's no reason why it can't be much higher resolution, especially now that we have home-video access to the film. In addition, we recently passed a new image policy requiring images to be a minimum of 400px when possible. This image can certainly meet that standard, though it does not currently. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:11, September 28, 2016 (UTC)
    • Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:27, September 28, 2016 (UTC)
      • The body image, too, naturally. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:57, October 5, 2016 (UTC)
        • Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:41, October 7, 2016 (UTC)
          • Is that the best we can get for the Bio image? It looks really blurry. If you're altering it in any way besides just cropping, such as zooming in, don't, because it makes it look bad. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:13, October 8, 2016 (UTC)
            • Without zooming the previous version was the best I could get it to look, although I'll admit I'm no expert at these things. Which is preferable? Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:36, October 9, 2016 (UTC)
              • I've replaced the image with a promotional image including Carsamba that I've recently discovered. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:51, August 3, 2017 (UTC)
                • Very good. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:35, August 22, 2017 (UTC)
  • The second Bio paragraph is really confusing, especially trying to read it around all of those reference notes. Can you try and break it up into at least two separate sentences, both to justify the paragraph and make it easier to understand what's being said there? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:35, August 22, 2017 (UTC)
    • Ok I've split it and tried to make it a little clearer. What I'm trying to describe is presumably an error in shot continuity, in which the first shot of the line shows Bobbajo second and the humanoid third, but then in the second shot it shows Bobbajo second, Carsamba third and the humanoid fourth. Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:55, August 23, 2017 (UTC)
      • I see now. It looks better. To more clearly state what you've just explained for me, I would suggest saying something like, "Carsamba fell into position between the pet seller and storyteller Bobbajo and another humanoid scavenger at the end of the line." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:50, August 23, 2017 (UTC)
        • Done as per your wording. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:03, August 23, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:29, August 23, 2017 (UTC)