Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/High-Altitude Entry Transport-221

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

High-Altitude Entry Transport-221

  • Nominated by: —Unsigned comment by KyleThatKees (talk • contribs)
  • Nomination comments: I think that this article is worthy of a nomination to good article status. If you have objections to this please let me know via my talk page.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Ratts
  • Unsourced items in the infobox.
  • Infobox exclusive info.
  • Intro exclusive info.
  • Assault transport links to a completely different ship.
  • Battle of Utapau not mentioned in intro.
  • Characteristics section has one paragraph much larger than the other two.
  • "Utupau" is misspelled.
  • History section is woefully underwritten.
  • BTS virtually copy pasted from Databank.
  • Have you checked all sources for info, including Star Wars: The Official Starships & Vehicles Collection 27 and The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, which currently are not referenced anywhere in the article? RattsT (talk) 10:52, July 13, 2020 (UTC)
UberSoldat
  • First thing's first, do you have access to the sources listed in the article? UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 10:55, July 13, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

  1. ACvote Nominator has left the wiki. MasterCommerce GuildFredcerique 01:18, July 14, 2020 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:18, July 14, 2020 (UTC)
  3. ACvote I was wondering whether it was appropriate to remove this early, but having thought about it, the nominator has shown on several occasions that they're unwilling to read the GAN instructions, or even work on their own articles. With this one, they're still showing massive confusion about the nomination process in general, showing they clearly haven't read the instructions. As Fred said, after several warnings on their talk page, the user declared that they were leaving. Coupled with the fact that I'm certain the nominator won't respond to the objections left here, I think it's definitely appropriate to remove this under the nonsense nomination clause. Tommy-Macaroni 09:41, July 14, 2020 (UTC)